Literature DB >> 22315155

Goserelin versus leuprolide in the chemical castration of patients with prostate cancer.

Élcio Dias Silva1, Ubirajara Ferreira, Wagner Matheus, Eliney F Faria, Gustavo D Silva, Minori Saito, Auro A S de Souza, Azuil Laranjo, Otavio Clark, Luis Alberto Magna, Lísias Nogueira Castilho, Leonardo Oliveira Reis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative efficiency of leuprolide 3.75 mg, leuprolide 7.5 mg, and goserelin 3.6 mg in relation to the reduction in serum testosterone, regarding the levels of castration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated prospectively 60 randomized patients with advanced prostate carcinoma, with indication for hormone blockade. The patients were divided into 3 groups of 20: Group (1) received leuprolide 3.75 mg; Group (2) received leuprolide 7.5 mg; and Group (3) received goserelin 3.6 mg. All groups were treated with monthly application of the respective drugs. The patients' levels of serum testosterone were evaluated in two moments: before the treatment and 3 months after the treatment.
RESULTS: The patients' ages were similar within the three groups, with a median of 72, 70, and 70 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Of the patients that received leuprolide 3.75 mg, leuprolide 7.5 mg, and goserelin 3.6 mg, 26.3, 25, and 35%, respectively, did not reach castration levels, considering a testosterone cutoff ≤ 50 ng/dl. And 68.4, 30, and 45%, respectively, did not reach castration levels, considering a testosterone cutoff ≤ 20 ng/dl.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in the levels of castration when comparing leuprolide 3.75 mg, leuprolide 7.5 mg, and goserelin 3.6 mg, altogether. When compared in groups of two, there was a statistically significant difference between leuprolide 3.75 mg and leuprolide 7.5 mg, the latter presented better results in reaching castration levels, cutoff ≤ 20 ng/dl. The importance of this difference, however, must be measured with caution, since the comparison of the three groups simultaneously did not reach the established significance level, even though it came close.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22315155     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0134-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  13 in total

Review 1.  The current state of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Beth A Hellerstedt; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Effect of orchidectomy on serum concentrations of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in patients with prostatic cancer.

Authors:  H F Røhl; H P Beuke
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992

3.  Comparison of testosterone and LH values in subcapsular vs total orchiectomy patients.

Authors:  J P Chapman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Overview of phase III trials on combined androgen treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Denis; G P Murphy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Failure to achieve castrate levels of testosterone during luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist therapy: the case for monitoring serum testosterone and a treatment decision algorithm.

Authors:  M G Oefelein; R Cornum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Maximal androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Schmitt; C Bennett; J Seidenfeld; D Samson; T Wilt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

7.  Reassessment of the definition of castrate levels of testosterone: implications for clinical decision making.

Authors:  M G Oefelein; A Feng; M J Scolieri; D Ricchiutti; M I Resnick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Impact of surgical and medical castration on serum testosterone level in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Antonio Galfano; Silvia Secco; Vincenzo Ficarra; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Comparison of subcapsular and total orchiectomy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  X Z Zhang; M P Donovan; B T Williams; J L Mohler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  A six-month, open-label study assessing a new formulation of leuprolide 7.5 mg for suppression of testosterone in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramon Perez-Marreno; Franklin M Chu; Donald Gleason; Edward Loizides; Barton Wachs; Robert C Tyler
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a contemporary systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Emerson Luis Zani; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Androgen deprivation and immunotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Melissa Gamat; Douglas G McNeel
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 3.  Maximal testosterone suppression in prostate cancer--free vs total testosterone.

Authors:  Kyle O Rove; E David Crawford; Massimo Perachino; Juan Morote; Laurence Klotz; Paul H Lange; Gerald L Andriole; Alvin M Matsumoto; Samir S Taneja; Mario A Eisenberger; Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Practical differences between luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: perspectives across the spectrum of care.

Authors:  Davide Meani; Mladen Solarić; Harri Visapää; Rose-Marie Rosén; Robert Janknegt; Majana Soče
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-23

5.  Leuprolide acetate 1-, 3- and 6-monthly depot formulations in androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer in nine European countries: evidence review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Jaro Wex; Manpreet Sidhu; Isaac Odeyemi; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Peny Retsa; Bertrand Tombal
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 6.  Androgen-targeted therapy in men with prostate cancer: evolving practice and future considerations.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Axel Heidenreich; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Bertrand Tombal; Antonio C L Pompeo; Arturo Mendoza-Valdes; Kurt Miller; Frans M J Debruyne; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Effectiveness of three different luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the chemical castration of patients with prostate cancer: Goserelin versus triptorelin versus leuprolide.

Authors:  Myungsun Shim; Woo Jin Bang; Cheol Young Oh; Yong Seong Lee; Jin Seon Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 8.  Advances in hormonal therapies for hormone naïve and castration-resistant prostate cancers with or without previous chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thy Pham; Martin C Sadowski; Huika Li; Derek J Richard; Michael C d'Emden; Kerry Richard
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22

Review 9.  Reporting and ideal testosterone levels in men undergoing androgen deprivation for prostate cancer-time for a rethink?

Authors:  Sonja Cabarkapa; Marlon Perera; Ken Sikaris; Jonathan S O'Brien; Damien M Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2017-06-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.