Literature DB >> 8625631

Organ donor potential and performance: size and nature of the organ donor shortfall.

S L Gortmaker1, C L Beasley, L E Brigham, H G Franz, R N Garrison, B A Lucas, R H Patterson, A M Sobol, N A Grenvik, M J Evanisko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the potential for solid organ donation; to identify modifiable reasons for nondonation.
DESIGN: Retrospective medical records review.
SETTING: Sixty-nine acute care hospitals in four geographic areas of the United States in 1990, and a stratified random sample of 89 hospitals in three of the same areas and 33 of the same hospitals in 1993. PATIENTS: PATIENTS < or = 70 yrs of age who were brain dead and medically suitable for donation.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Standard forms were used to record patient demographic and hospital information. Reasons for nondonation were coded as "not identified," "family not asked," "consent denied," or "other." The main outcome measures were rate of donation and rates of nonidentification, not asking, and nonconsent. Organ donation occurred among 33% (299/916) of medically suitable cases identified in 1990 (95% confidence interval 30% to 36%). Ninety-four potential donors were not identified, 156 were not asked, 326 families denied consent, and 41 potential donors were categorized as "other," including patients who had suffered a cardiac arrest, and medical examiner prohibition of donation. In the 1993 study, organ donation occurred in an estimated 33% of suitable cases. In 1990, rates of donation were highest among patients <50 yrs of age, patients who died of traumatic causes, and non-Hispanic white patients. Logistic regression showed lower odds of donation for African American patients (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.63) independent of potentially confounding hospital and patient variables (p=.0001). Donation rates did not vary by hospital size or type.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite legal and policy initiatives, only one third of potential donors became donors in 1990, with similar results in 1993. Extrapolating the 1990 findings to the United States suggests a pool of 13,700 medically suitable donors per year. Prospective identification and requesting donation in all suitable potential donor cases could lead to 1,800 additional donors per year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8625631     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199603000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  15 in total

1.  Donation intentions among African American college students: decisional balance and self-efficacy measures.

Authors:  Kara L Hall; Mark L Robbins; Andrea Paiva; J Eugene Knott; Lorna Harris; Burton Mattice
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-08-03

2.  A method for estimating solid organ donor potential by organ procurement region.

Authors:  C L Christiansen; S L Gortmaker; J M Williams; C L Beasley; L E Brigham; C Capossela; M E Matthiesen; S Gunderson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Organ donation after death in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Frank Markel; Damon C Scales
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Orthotopic liver transplantation in high-risk patients: risk factors associated with mortality and infectious morbidity.

Authors:  T Gayowski; I R Marino; N Singh; H Doyle; M Wagener; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  A survey on patients admitted in severe coma: implications for brain death identification and organ donation.

Authors:  Kamel Senouci; Patrice Guerrini; Eloi Diene; Alain Atinault; Jacky Claquin; Francis Bonnet; Philippe Tuppin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Identifying the potential organ donor: an audit of hospital deaths.

Authors:  Helen Ingrid Opdam; William Silvester
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Organ and tissue donation in a regional paediatric intensive care unit: evaluation of practice.

Authors:  Laura Carone; Shrirang Alurkar; Phoebe Kigozi; Harish Vyas
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  The influence of race on approaching families for organ donation and their decision to donate.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; P McNamara; M J Evanisko; C Beasley; C O Callender; A Poretsky
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Imminent brain death: point of departure for potential heart-beating organ donor recognition.

Authors:  Yorick J de Groot; Nichon E Jansen; Jan Bakker; Michael A Kuiper; Stan Aerdts; Andrew I R Maas; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Hendrik A van Leiden; Andries J Hoitsma; Berry H P H Kremer; Erwin J O Kompanje
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Donor conversion rates depend on the assessment tools used in the evaluation of potential organ donors.

Authors:  Yorick J de Groot; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Mathieu van der Jagt; Jan Bakker; Hester F Lingsma; Jan N M Ijzermans; Erwin J O Kompanje
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.