BACKGROUND: Shortfalls in deceased organ donation lead to shortages of solid organs available for transplantation. We assessed rates of deceased organ donation and compared hospitals that had clinical services for transplant recipients (transplant hospitals) to those that did not (general hospitals). METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis involving patients who died from traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage or other catastrophic neurologic conditions in Ontario, Canada, between Apr. 1, 1994, and Mar. 31, 2011. We distinguished between acute care hospitals with and without transplant services. The primary outcome was actual organ donation determined through the physician database for organ procurement procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 87,129 patients died from catastrophic neurologic conditions during the study period, of whom 1930 became actual donors. Our primary analysis excluded patients from small hospitals, reducing the total to 79,746 patients, of whom 1898 became actual donors. Patients who died in transplant hospitals had a distribution of demographic characteristics similar to that of patients who died in other large general hospitals. Transplant hospitals had an actual donor rate per 100 deaths that was about 4 times the donor rate at large general hospitals (5.0 v. 1.4, p < 0.001). The relative reduction in donations at general hospitals was accentuated among older patients, persisted among patients who were the most eligible candidates and amounted to about 121 fewer actual donors per year (adjusted odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.92). Hospital volumes were only weakly correlated with actual organ donation rates. INTERPRETATION: Optimizing organ donation requires greater attention to large general hospitals. These hospitals account for most of the potential donors and missed opportunities for deceased organ donation.
BACKGROUND: Shortfalls in deceased organ donation lead to shortages of solid organs available for transplantation. We assessed rates of deceased organ donation and compared hospitals that had clinical services for transplant recipients (transplant hospitals) to those that did not (general hospitals). METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis involving patients who died from traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage or other catastrophic neurologic conditions in Ontario, Canada, between Apr. 1, 1994, and Mar. 31, 2011. We distinguished between acute care hospitals with and without transplant services. The primary outcome was actual organ donation determined through the physician database for organ procurement procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 87,129 patients died from catastrophic neurologic conditions during the study period, of whom 1930 became actual donors. Our primary analysis excluded patients from small hospitals, reducing the total to 79,746 patients, of whom 1898 became actual donors. Patients who died in transplant hospitals had a distribution of demographic characteristics similar to that of patients who died in other large general hospitals. Transplant hospitals had an actual donor rate per 100 deaths that was about 4 times the donor rate at large general hospitals (5.0 v. 1.4, p < 0.001). The relative reduction in donations at general hospitals was accentuated among older patients, persisted among patients who were the most eligible candidates and amounted to about 121 fewer actual donors per year (adjusted odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.92). Hospital volumes were only weakly correlated with actual organ donation rates. INTERPRETATION: Optimizing organ donation requires greater attention to large general hospitals. These hospitals account for most of the potential donors and missed opportunities for deceased organ donation.
Authors: Kenneth E Wood; Bryan N Becker; John G McCartney; Anthony M D'Alessandro; Douglas B Coursin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ellen Sheehy; Suzanne L Conrad; Lori E Brigham; Richard Luskin; Phyllis Weber; Mark Eakin; Lawrence Schkade; Lawrence Hunsicker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mazen Hassanain; Eve Simoneau; Suhail A Doi; Murad Aljiffry; Abdulla Aloraini; Ahmad Madkhali; Peter Metrakos Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Olli-Pekka Kämäräinen; Jukka Huttunen; Antti Lindgren; Maarit Lång; Stepani Bendel; Ari Uusaro; Ilkka Parviainen; Timo Koivisto; Helena Isoniemi; Juha E Jääskeläinen Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Pierre Marsolais; Gabrielle Larouche; Anne-Marie Lagacé; Virginie Williams; Karim Serri; Francis Bernard; Philippe Rico; Anne Julie Frenette; David Williamson; Martin Albert; Emmanuel Charbonney Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Alvin Ho-ting Li; S Joseph Kim; Jagadish Rangrej; Damon C Scales; Salimah Shariff; Donald A Redelmeier; Greg Knoll; Ann Young; Amit X Garg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alvin Ho-Ting Li; Eric McArthur; Janet Maclean; Cynthia Isenor; Versha Prakash; S Joseph Kim; Greg Knoll; Baiju Shah; Amit X Garg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240