Literature DB >> 8625148

Survival after curative resection of lymph node negative colorectal carcinoma. A prospective study of 910 patients.

R C Newland1, O F Dent, P H Chapuis, L Bokey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all patients treated for colorectal carcinoma by bowel resection have neither lymph node metastases nor known residual tumor (clinicopathologic Stages A and B). The aim of this study was to compare the survival of these patients with that of the general population and to explain any significant difference.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data recorded for 910 patients from one institution during a period of 21.5 years were used in the analysis. Patient follow-up ranged from 6 months to 21.5 years. The "Survival" procedure, developed by the Finnish Cancer Registry, was used to compare the observed survival of patients with their expected survival, based on age- and sex-matched data from the population of New South Wales. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate models were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Males with tumor spread beyond the muscularis propria (Stage B) was the only group with significantly poorer survival than expected. The reduced survival in this group was due to the effects of four clinical variables (cardiovascular complication, permanent stoma, urgent operation, respiratory complication) and one pathologic variable (direct spread involving a free serosal surface) acting independently.
CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with clinicopathologic Stages A or B tumors closely matched their expected survival as predicted from the general population. Males with Stage B tumors were the only exception and their significantly reduced survival was largely due to clinical, as distinct from pathologic factors. These findings suggest that the risk of occult metastases is low for patients with Stages A and B tumors using this classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8625148     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950815)76:4<564::aid-cncr2820760405>3.0.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeremy R Jass; Michael J O'Brien; Robert H Riddell; Dale C Snover
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Incidence and survival of patients with Dukes' A (stages T1 and T2) colorectal carcinoma: a 15-year population-based study.

Authors:  Carmela Di Gregorio; Piero Benatti; Lorena Losi; Luca Roncucci; Giuseppina Rossi; Giovanni Ponti; Massimiliano Marino; Monica Pedroni; Alessandra Scarselli; Barbara Roncari; Maurizio Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Expression patterns of dysadherin and E-cadherin in lymph node metastases of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Batistatou; Alexander K Charalabopoulos; Chrisoula D Scopa; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Angelos Kappas; Setsuo Hirohashi; Niki J Agnantis; Konstantinos Charalabopoulos
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessment.

Authors:  Carmen Faus; Desamparados Roda; Matteo Frasson; Susana Roselló; Eduardo García-Granero; Blas Flor-Lorente; Samuel Navarro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes' B colon cancer.

Authors:  V C Petersen; K J Baxter; S B Love; N A Shepherd
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The role of hypoxia in recurrence following resection of Dukes' B colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Rajaganeshan; R Prasad; P J Guillou; G Poston; N Scott; D G Jayne
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Clinical significance of pT sub-classification in surgical pathology of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marion J Pollheimer; Peter Kornprat; Verena S Pollheimer; Richard A Lindtner; Andrea Schlemmer; Peter Rehak; Cord Langner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Elastic laminal invasion in colon cancer: diagnostic utility and histological features.

Authors:  Motohiro Kojima; Mitsuru Yokota; Norio Saito; Shogo Nomura; Atsushi Ochiai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.