Literature DB >> 8609337

The atropine factor in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Echo Persantine (EPIC) and Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups.

A Pingitore1, E Picano, M Q Colosso, B Reisenhofer, G Gigli, A R Lucarini, N Petix, M Previtali, R Bigi, G Chiarandà, G Minardi, M de Alcantara, J Lowenstein, M G Sclavo, C Palmieri, A Galati, G Seveso, J Heyman, W Mathias, F Casazza, R Sicari, M Raciti, P Landi, M Marzilli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare, head to head, the two most popular pharmacologic stress echocardiographic tests--dipyridamole and dobutamine--with state of the art protocols in a large multicenter prospective study.
BACKGROUND: In the continuing quest for ideal diagnostic accuracy, pharmacologic stress echocardiography has quickly moved over the years from low to high dose regimens and is currently performed with atropine coadministration.
METHODS: Dobutamine (up to 40 microgram/kg body weight per min) plus atropine (up to 1 mg over 4 h) and dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg/kg per min over 10 h) plus atropine (up to 1 mg over 4 h) stress echocardiography was performed on different days, in random order and within 1 week in 360 patients with chest pain syndrome. Thirteen different echocardiographic laboratories, all fulfilling quality control criteria for stress echocardiographic reading, contributed to the study.
RESULTS: No major complications occurred during either test. The test was interrupted before achievement of predetermined end points for limiting side effects in 37 dobutamine-atropine and 7 dipyridamole-atropine stress echocardiographic studies (feasibility 90% vs. 98%, p < 0.01). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in a subset of 110 patients with no obvious rest dyssynergy (akinesia or dyskinesia) who underwent coronary angiography independently of test results and within 1 week of testing. Significant coronary artery disease (> or = 50% diameter reduction in at least one major coronary vessel by quantitative coronary angiography) was found in 92 patients. Sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease was 84% (77 of 92) for dobutamine-atropine and 82% (75 of 92) for dipyridamole-atropine stress echocardiography (p = NS), with a specificity of 89% (16 of 18) for dobutamine-atropine and 94% (17 of 18) for dipyridamole-atropine stress echocardiography (p = NS). A significant correlation was present between peak wall motion score index during dipyridamole-atropine and dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine and dipyridamole-atropine stress echocardiography are safe and feasible, although submaximal studies are more frequent with dobutamine. The two stresses have comparable accuracy in the detection of angiographically assessed coronary artery disease, although dobutamine is marginally more sensitive and dipyridamole marginally more specific. Stratification of the ischemic response in the space domain is also comparable with the two stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609337     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00586-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  11 in total

1.  A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Stress echocardiography: the long and winding road from meta-analysis to bedside.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography: safety in diagnosing coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F Lattanzi; E Picano; E Adamo; A Varga
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Feasibility, safety and accuracy of regadenoson-atropine (REGAT) stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an angiographic correlative study.

Authors:  Kamran Shaikh; Dee Dee Wang; Hani Saad; Mohsin Alam; Akshay Khandelwal; Kristen Brooks; Hari Iyer; Phuc Nguyen; Stephanie Boedeker; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

7.  Selection of the optimal stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J A San Román; I Vilacosta; J A Castillo; M J Rollán; M Hernández; V Peral; I Garcimartín; M M de la Torre; F Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Comparison of exercise, dobutamine-atropine and dipyridamole-atropine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ivana Nedeljkovic; Miodrag Ostojic; Branko Beleslin; Ana Djordjevic-Dikic; Jelena Stepanovic; Milan Nedeljkovic; Sinisa Stojkovic; Goran Stankovic; Jovica Saponjski; Zorica Petrasinovic; Vojislav Giga; Predrag Mitrovic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  The effects of beta-blockers on dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: early protocol versus standard protocol.

Authors:  Ana C Camarozano; Plínio Resende; Aristarco G Siqueira-Filho; Luis H Weitzel; Rosangela Noe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Feasibility, safety and tolerability of accelerated dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Giovanni Minardi; Carla Manzara; Giovanni Pulignano; Paolo G Pino; Herribert Pavaci; Martina Sordi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.