Literature DB >> 8608513

The fall in incidence of prostate carcinoma. On the down side of a prostate specific antigen induced peak in incidence--data from the Utah Cancer Registry.

R A Stephenson1, C R Smart, G P Mineau, B C James, D T Janerich, R L Dibble.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the 1980s, prostate specific antigen (PSA) came into wide use as a prostate carcinoma screening and detection method in the United States. Following the introduction of PSA, the age-adjusted incidence of prostate carcinoma reported by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program in the United States rose rapidly (from 84.4/100,000 in 1984 to 163/100,000 in 1991). When an increase in incidence is observed following the introduction of a screening method, a subsequent decrease in incidence may be expected as prevalent cases are removed from the population (a cull effect). Incidence rates may also fall due to factors such as decreased intensity of screening. The Utah Cancer Registry data were examined for a decrease in prostate cancer incidence.
METHODS: We tracked age-adjusted prostate carcinoma incidence trends from the population-based Utah Cancer Registry and compared them with rates from the SEER national registry.
RESULTS: A rapid and highly correlated rise in prostate carcinoma incidence has been observed in both SEER and Utah incidence rates between 1988 and 1991, the last year for which SEER data are available. In 1992, Utah incidence rates peaked at 236.2 per 100,000. In 1993 and 1994, Utah incidence rates fell to 195.0, and an estimated 164.0 per 100,000, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Population-based data from the Utah Cancer Registry indicates that the incidence of prostate carcinoma is decreasing rapidly after a similarly rapid increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8608513     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1342::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?

Authors:  André N Vis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Current and projected annual direct costs of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  M D Krahn; A Coombs; I G Levy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Differential expression of E-cadherin and P-cadherin in pT3 prostate cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological features.

Authors:  Catarina Ferreira; João Lobo; Luís Antunes; Paula Lopes; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Population-based prostate cancer trends in the United States: patterns of change in the era of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  R A Stephenson; J L Stanford
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality: an analysis of mortality change by screening intensity.

Authors:  Andrew J Coldman; Norman Phillips; Thomas A Pickles
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Prostate cancer, Incidence, management and outcomes.

Authors:  E J Small
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Current Challenges in Prostate Cancer Management and the Rationale behind Targeted Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Al B Barqawi; Kevin J Krughoff; Khadijah Eid
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.