Literature DB >> 15717190

Effects of unisegmental disc compression on adjacent segments: an in vivo animal model.

Frank Unglaub1, Thorsten Guehring, Helga Lorenz, Claus Carstens, Markus W Kroeber.   

Abstract

It is controversial whether fusion of discs in the spine leads to increased degeneration on the remaining discs or whether the degenerative changes are merely a part of the inevitable natural history process. To determine the effects of unisegmental compression and subsequent recovery on adjacent segments, we studied histology, radiology and intradiscal pressure using an in vivo rabbit model. Fifteen New Zealand rabbits were divided in to three groups of five. In the first group, the intervertebral disc L4-L5 of the lumbar spine was axially loaded for 28 days with an external loading device. In the second group, the intervertebral disc was compressed for 28 days and allowed to recover for an equal amount of time, with the loading device removed. Five animals underwent a sham operation, in which the external loading device was situated, but their discs remained unloaded for 28 days. The intradiscal pressure was determined in the loaded discs as well as in the cranial and caudal adjacent discs. Lateral radiographs were taken from each subjected intervertebral disc with adjacent vertebral bodies and the cranial and caudal adjacent segments. The compressed discs showed lower intradiscal pressure in comparison with the control group, which remained unloaded. In the cranial and caudal discs adjacent to the loaded discs the average intradiscal pressure was similar to the unloaded controls. The loaded discs demonstrated a significant decrease in disc space. No discs adjacent to the loaded discs changed in height. The lamellar architecture of the inner, middle, and outer annulus became more disorganized in the loaded discs. The nucleus pulposus showed increase of mucoid degeneration and increased cell death. Intervertebral discs from the control group and the adjacent discs to the compressed discs maintained their normal morphology. This study shows that mechanical loading of discs in the spine can cause rapid degeneration. Adjacent discs, however, did not change in terms of radiology, intradiscal pressure, or histology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15717190     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0800-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

Review 1.  The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration.

Authors:  T Videman; M C Battié
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Sulphated acid mucopolysaccharide metabolism in the rabbit intervertebral disc.

Authors:  W A Souter; T K Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1970-05

3.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  C K Lee; N A Langrana
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Stress exertion on adjacent segments after ventral cervical fusion.

Authors:  P Gruss; H Tannenbaum
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1983

6.  Compression-induced changes in intervertebral disc properties in a rat tail model.

Authors:  J C Iatridis; P L Mente; I A Stokes; D D Aronsson; M Alini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion.

Authors:  M F Hambly; L L Wiltse; N Raghavan; G Schneiderman; C Koenig
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; E N Hanley; J Howe; D Kuhlmann; R E Matteri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to nucleus pulposus cells. Implications for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  K Nishida; J D Kang; J K Suh; P D Robbins; C H Evans; L G Gilbertson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A study of the effects of bipedism and upright posture on the lumbosacral spine and paravertebral muscles of the Wistar rat.

Authors:  J D Cassidy; K Yong-Hing; W H Kirkaldy-Willis; A A Wilkinson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Sensitivity of notochordal disc cells to mechanical loading: an experimental animal study.

Authors:  Thorsten Guehring; Andreas Nerlich; Markus Kroeber; Wiltrud Richter; Georg W Omlor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intradiscal pressure measurements in normal discs, compressed discs and compressed discs treated with axial posterior disc distraction: an experimental study on the rabbit lumbar spine model.

Authors:  Thorsten Guehring; Frank Unglaub; Helga Lorenz; Georg Omlor; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Markus W Kroeber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.