Literature DB >> 8604782

Physician use in Ontario and the United States: The impact of socioeconomic status and health status.

S J Katz1, T P Hofer, W G Manning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared physician use in Ontario and the midwestern and northeastern United States for persons of different socioeconomic status and health status. The distribution of health problems associated with the most recent physician visit also was compared.
METHODS: The design of the study was cross sectional; data derived from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey and the 1990 US National Health Interview Survey were used in analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, persons in Ontario averaged 19% more visits than US residents, but differences varied markedly across income and health status. At each level of health status, low- income Canadians had 25% to 33% more visits than their US counterparts. However, among higher income persons, those in excellent or very good health had 22% more visits than Americans, while those in good, fair, or poor health had 10% fewer visits than Americans. Higher visit rates in Ontario were not associated with a greater prevalence of low- priority visits.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the Canadian single- payer system, medical care in Ontario has been redistributed to low-income persons and the elderly. Compared with the United States, there has been a lower intensity of medical care for the sick higher income population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604782      PMCID: PMC1380552          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.4.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  How does Canada do it? A comparison of expenditures for physicians' services in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  V R Fuchs; J S Hahn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The distribution of medical services before and after "free" medical care--the Quebec experience.

Authors:  P E Enterline; V Salter; A D McDonald; J C McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  D B Mark; C D Naylor; M A Hlatky; R M Califf; E J Topol; C B Granger; J D Knight; C L Nelson; K L Lee; N E Clapp-Channing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The validity of self-reported physician utilization measures.

Authors:  P D Cleary; A M Jette
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The national profile of access to medical care: where do we stand?

Authors:  L A Aday; R M Andersen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Equality in medical care under national health insurance in Montreal.

Authors:  J Siemiatycki; L Richardson; I B Pless
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Self-evaluated health and mortality among the elderly in New Haven, Connecticut, and Iowa and Washington counties, Iowa, 1982-1986.

Authors:  E L Idler; S V Kasl; J H Lemke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.

Authors:  J M Mossey; E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Effects of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M F Shapiro; J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  National health accounts: lessons from the U.S. experience.

Authors:  H C Lazenby; K R Levit; D R Waldo; G S Adler; S W Letsch; C A Cowan
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1992
View more
  15 in total

1.  Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The relationship between work hours and utilization of general practitioners in four Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; George Kephart; Lori J Curtis; Kelly Bower; Nazeem Muhajarine; Robert Reid; Leslie Roos
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Socioeconomic status and incidence of sudden cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Kyndaron Reinier; Elizabeth Thomas; Douglas L Andrusiek; Tom P Aufderheide; Steven C Brooks; Clifton W Callaway; Paul E Pepe; Thomas D Rea; Robert H Schmicker; Christian Vaillancourt; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Socioeconomic differences in the use of physician services in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  G Kephart; V S Thomas; D R MacLean
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Children in need of Pharmacare: medication funding requests at the Toronto Hospital for Sick Children.

Authors:  Wendy J Ungar; Carolyn Daniels; Ted McNeill; Mahdie Seyed
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

6.  Access to health care among status Aboriginal people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Song Gao; Braden J Manns; Bruce F Culleton; Marcello Tonelli; Hude Quan; Lynden Crowshoe; William A Ghali; Lawrence W Svenson; Sofia Ahmed; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The relationship between socio-economic factors and responsiveness gaps in primary, preventative and health promotion services.

Authors:  Yair Zalmanovitch; Dana R Vashdi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Socioeconomic disparities in health care use: Does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health?

Authors:  P J Veugelers; A M Yip
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  A comparison of cardiovascular procedure use between the United States and Canada.

Authors:  D K Verrilli; R Berenson; S J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Need-based resource allocation: different need indicators, different results?

Authors:  George Kephart; Yukiko Asada
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.