Literature DB >> 9685118

A comparison of cardiovascular procedure use between the United States and Canada.

D K Verrilli1, R Berenson, S J Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative volume and intensity of all types of cardiovascular procedures, noninvasive tests, and diagnostic imaging for all elderly individuals between the United States and the three largest Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia) by patient age. DATA SOURCES: Service volume data for the United States for a one percent random sample of claims obtained from Medicare's National Claims History System. Data for Canada were obtained from the Ministries of Health in the three provinces representing 100 percent of the claims received by each Ministry. STUDY
DESIGN: Design is a cross-sectional analysis of 1992 claims data. DATA EXTRACTION
METHODS: The volume of cardiovascular services was measured in terms of the relative value units (RVUs) used in the Medicare fee schedule to calculate payments. Services were disaggregated into nine clinical categories, and comparisons were made by type of cardiovascular service and patient age.
RESULTS: Overall, cardiovascular procedure RVUs per elderly beneficiary are 53 percent greater in the United States than in Canada. Differences are largest for surgical procedures such as carotid thromboendarterectomy and revascularization procedures and smallest for diagnostic imaging and noninvasive tests. The differences between the countries in the use of cardiovascular procedures increase markedly with age. For example, the United States-to-Canada ratio for PTCA use is 1.87 for persons age 65 to 69, but 7.68 for persons age 80 and older. For CABG, the ratios are 1.36 and 7.16, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that global budgets in Canada result in lower levels of cardiovascular service use among the elderly, particularly among the very aged elderly. Patient age appears to play a much more important role in determining the recipients of cardiovascular procedures in Canada than in the United States. Whether these higher rates of procedure use among the very elderly in the United States compared to Canada reflect profligate service use or contribute to improved outcomes is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9685118      PMCID: PMC1070272     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  37 in total

1.  Canadians' use of U.S. medical services.

Authors:  S J Katz; D Verrilli; M L Barer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Ethical constraints on rationing medical care by age.

Authors:  N S Jecker; R A Pearlman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Dramatic changes in the performance of endarterectomy for diseases of the extracranial arteries of the head.

Authors:  R Pokras; M L Dyken
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  C M Winslow; D H Solomon; M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; N J Merrick; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The paradox of appropriate care.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Carotid endarterectomy--an expression of concern.

Authors:  H J Barnett; F Plum; J N Walton
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study.

Authors:  M P Nevitt; D J Ballard; J W Hallett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Repeat coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  B Meier; S B King; A R Gruentzig; J S Douglas; J Hollman; T Ischinger; K Galan; R Tankersley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and predictors of recurrent restenosis.

Authors:  P J Quigley; M A Hlatky; T Hinohara; D S Rendall; J A Perez; H R Phillips; R M Califf; R S Stack
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Age as a factor in critical care unit admissions.

Authors:  T J Nuckton; N D List
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.