Literature DB >> 3946953

Effects of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial.

M F Shapiro, J E Ware, C D Sherbourne.   

Abstract

To estimate the effect of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms, we analyzed data for 3539 persons aged 17 to 61 from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to a free-care group or to insurance plans requiring them to pay part of the costs (cost-sharing group). Annual surveys were administered to determine if participants had serious and minor symptoms during the preceding month and whether they saw a physician. Serious symptoms were judged by a panel of physicians to warrant care in most instances; minor symptoms were judged neither to be severe nor to warrant care in most instances. The cost-sharing group was nearly one third less likely than the free-care group to see a physician when they had minor symptoms (6.3% compared with 9.0%; p less than 0.04). The free-care and cost-sharing groups did not differ significantly in seeking care for serious symptoms (22.3% compared with 17.9%; p = 0.095). However, for participants with low socioeconomic status who began the study in poor health, the prevalence of serious symptoms was higher in the cost-sharing than the free-care group (29.1% compared with 23.8%, p less than 0.004).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3946953     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

1.  Managed care plan performance since 1980: another look at 2 literature reviews.

Authors:  K Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effects of cost sharing on care seeking and health status: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  M D Wong; R Andersen; C D Sherbourne; R D Hays; M F Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  A framework for cost-sharing policy analysis.

Authors:  R J Rubin; D N Mendelson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Regular source of ambulatory care and access to health services.

Authors:  R A Hayward; A M Bernard; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.

Authors:  John Hsu; Mary Price; Richard Brand; G Thomas Ray; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011.

Authors:  Astrid Kiil; Kurt Houlberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-29

7.  When patients have to pay a share of drug costs: effects on frequency of physician visits, hospital admissions and filling of prescriptions.

Authors:  Aslam H Anis; Daphne P Guh; Diane Lacaille; Carlo A Marra; Amir A Rashidi; Xin Li; John M Esdaile
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Primary care visits and health policy.

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Development of a novel, objective measure of health care-related financial burden for U.S. families with children.

Authors:  Lauren E Wisk; Ronald Gangnon; David J Vanness; Alison A Galbraith; John Mullahy; Whitney P Witt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Why it's time for a national health program in the United States.

Authors:  H Waitzkin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.