Literature DB >> 8604765

Switching Swiss enrollees from indemnity health insurance to managed care: the effect on health status and stisfaction with care.

T V Perneger1, J F Etter, A Rougemont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 1992, most members of a Swiss indemnity health insurance plan were automatically transferred into a newly created managed care organization. This study examined whether this semivoluntary change affected enrollees' health status and satisfaction with care.
METHODS: Three groups of enrollees were compared: 332 plan members who accepted the switch (managed care joiners); 186 plan members who opted to maintain indemnity coverage (non-joiners); and 296 persons continuosly enrolled in another indemnity plan (indemnity plan members). Health status, health related behaviors, and satisfaction with care received in the previous year were surveyed at baseline and 1 year later.
RESULTS: Health status remained unchanged in all three groups. Smoking prevalence decreased among managed care joiners but remained constant in the other groups. Satisfaction with insurance coverage increased between baseline and follow-up in managed care joiners, but decreased in nonjoiners and indemnity plan members. The latter groups had higher satisfaction with health care, particularly with continuity of care.
CONCLUSIONS: A semivoluntary switch from indemnity health insurance to managed care reduced satisfaction with health care but increased satisfaction with insurance coverage. There were no changes in self-perceived health status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604765      PMCID: PMC1380521          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.3.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  21 in total

1.  The effects of a prepaid group practice on mental health outcomes.

Authors:  K B Wells; W G Manning; R B Valdez
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Health care rationing through inconvenience. The third party's secret weapon.

Authors:  G W Grumet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The triple option choice: self-selection bias in traditional coverage, HMOs, and PPOs.

Authors:  I Strumwasser; N V Paranjpe; D L Ronis; J McGinnis; D W Kee; H L Hall
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 5.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care.

Authors:  J E Ware; R H Brook; W H Rogers; E B Keeler; A R Davies; C D Sherbourne; G A Goldberg; P Camp; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  HMOs and the quality of care.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  A follow-up comparison of patient satisfaction among prepaid and fee-for-service patients.

Authors:  J P Murray
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Consumer acceptance of prepaid and fee-for-service medical care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A R Davies; J E Ware; R H Brook; J R Peterson; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Patient satisfaction among elderly enrollees and disenrollees in Medicare health maintenance organizations. Results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation.

Authors:  L F Rossiter; K Langwell; T T Wan; M Rivnyak
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  The effects of gatekeeping: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marcial Velasco Garrido; Annette Zentner; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Unexpected effects of a prior feedback letter and a professional layout on the response rate to a mail survey in Geneva.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger; J D Laporte
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Comparison of patient satisfaction with ambulatory visits in competing health care delivery settings in Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; M A Raetzo; P Schaller; H Stalder
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Health care expenditures after introduction of a gatekeeper and a global budget in a Swiss health insurance plan.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Integrated care organizations in Switzerland.

Authors:  Peter Berchtold; Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Patient Satisfaction with Community Health Service Centers as Gatekeepers and the Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shenzhen, China.

Authors:  Jiang Wu; Shengchao Zhang; Huiqing Chen; Yingyu Lin; Xiaoxin Dong; Xiaoxu Yin; Zuxun Lu; Shiyi Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors influencing government insurance scheme beneficiary acceptance of the gatekeeper policy: a cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Wenzhen Li; Dongming Wang; Yong Gan; Yanfeng Zhou; Yawen Chen; Jing Li; Naomiem Kkandawire; Sai Hu; Yan Qiao; Zuxun Lu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.