Literature DB >> 2211130

The effects of a prepaid group practice on mental health outcomes.

K B Wells1, W G Manning, R B Valdez.   

Abstract

Does a prepaid group practice relative to comparable fee-for-service plans lead to different mental health outcomes for its beneficiaries? To answer this question, we used data from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. We observed no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in mental health outcomes for families randomly assigned to Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound or to comparable fee-for-service insurance plans in the Seattle area. We found the same null result for overall mental health status as well as for psychological distress (e.g., anxiety and depression) and psychological well-being, and for the full population as well as the initially sick and poor, although our precision was low for the latter comparisons. Thus, the less intensive style of treatment in the prepaid group practice was not associated with noticeably worse mental health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2211130      PMCID: PMC1065648     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  14 in total

1.  Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience.

Authors:  P M Ellwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effects of insurance generosity on the psychological distress and psychological well-being of a general population.

Authors:  K B Wells; W G Manning; R B Valdez
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04

3.  Overview of adult health measures fielded in Rand's health insurance study.

Authors:  R H Brook; J E Ware; A Davies-Avery; A L Stewart; C A Donald; W H Rogers; K N Williams; S A Johnston
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A design for a health insurance experiment.

Authors:  J P Newhouse
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care.

Authors:  J E Ware; R H Brook; W H Rogers; E B Keeler; A R Davies; C D Sherbourne; G A Goldberg; P Camp; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Mental health services: utilization by low income enrollees in a prepaid group practice plan and in an independent practice plan.

Authors:  S J Williams; P Diehr; W L Drucker; W C Richardson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Contrasts in HMO and fee-for-service performance.

Authors:  C R Gaus; S Cooper; C G Hirschman
Journal:  Soc Secur Bull       Date:  1976-05

8.  Advances in the measurement of functional status: construction of aggregate indexes.

Authors:  A L Stewart; J E Ware; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Ambulatory mental health services utilization in three provider plans.

Authors:  P Diehr; S J Williams; D P Martin; K Price
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Use of outpatient mental health services in HMO and fee-for-service plans: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K B Wells; W G Manning; B Benjamin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluating health care programs by combining cost with quality of life measures: a case study comparing capitation and fee for service.

Authors:  Richard Grieve; Jasjeet S Sekhon; Teh-Wei Hu; Joan R Bloom
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Too little time? The recognition and treatment of mental health problems in primary care.

Authors:  S Glied
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Organizational structure and the delivery of primary care to older Americans.

Authors:  J S Zinn; V Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Switching Swiss enrollees from indemnity health insurance to managed care: the effect on health status and stisfaction with care.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.