Literature DB >> 8601478

Mutant rec-1 eliminates the meiotic pattern of crossing over in Caenorhabditis elegans.

M C Zetka1, A M Rose.   

Abstract

Meiotic crossovers are not randomly distributed along the chromosome. In Caenorhabditis elegans the central portions of the autosomes have relatively few crossovers compared to the flanking regions. We have measured the frequency of crossing over for several intervals across chromosome I in strains mutant for rec-1. The chromosome is approximately 50 map units in both wild-type and rec-1 homozygotes, however, the distribution of exchanges is very different in rec-1. Map distances expand across the gene cluster and contract near the right end of the chromosome, resulting in a genetic map more consistent with the physical map. Mutations in two other genes, him-6 and him-14, also disrupted the distribution of exchanges. Unlike rec-1, individuals homozygous for him-6 and him-14 had an overall reduction in the amount of crossing over accompanied by a high frequency of nondisjunction and reduced egg hatching. In rec-1; him-6 and rec-1; him-14 homozygotes the frequency of crossing over was characteristic of the Him mutant phenotype, whereas the distribution of the reduced number of exchanges was characteristic of the Rec-1 pattern. It appears that these gene products play a role in establishing the meiotic pattern of exchange events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8601478      PMCID: PMC1206871     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  Meiotic mutants that cause a polar decrease in recombination on the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S A Broverman; P M Meneely
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The genetic control of meiosis.

Authors:  B S Baker; A T Carpenter; M S Esposito; R E Esposito; L Sandler
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  A mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans that increases recombination frequency more than threefold.

Authors:  A M Rose; D L Baillie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster.

Authors:  B S Baker; A T Carpenter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Correlation of the physical and genetic maps in the lin-12 region of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  I Greenwald; A Coulson; J Sulston; J Priess
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The effects of translocations on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  K S McKim; A M Howell; A M Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Maternal-effect lethal mutations on linkage group II of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  K J Kemphues; M Kusch; N Wolf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The bli-4 locus of Caenorhabditis elegans encodes structurally distinct kex2/subtilisin-like endoproteases essential for early development and adult morphology.

Authors:  C Thacker; K Peters; M Srayko; A M Rose
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Evolutionarily conserved coding sequences in the dpy-20-unc-22 region of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S S Prasad; D L Baillie
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  Changes in chromatin structure at recombination initiation sites during yeast meiosis.

Authors:  K Ohta; T Shibata; A Nicolas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  36 in total

1.  Crossover distribution and high interference for both the X chromosome and an autosome during oogenesis and spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Philip M Meneely; Anna F Farago; Tate M Kauffman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Cancer models in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Natalia V Kirienko; Kumaran Mani; David S Fay
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 3.  Meiotic recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Tatiana Garcia-Muse; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  A targeted RNAi screen for genes involved in chromosome morphogenesis and nuclear organization in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline.

Authors:  M P Colaiácovo; G M Stanfield; K C Reddy; V Reinke; S K Kim; A M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Crossover heterogeneity in the absence of hotspots in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Taniya Kaur; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evidence for dysregulation of genome-wide recombination in oocytes with nondisjoined chromosomes 21.

Authors:  Candace D Middlebrooks; Nandita Mukhopadhyay; Stuart W Tinker; Emily Graves Allen; Lora J H Bean; Ferdouse Begum; Reshmi Chowdhury; Vivian Cheung; Kimberly Doheny; Marcia Adams; Eleanor Feingold; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast.

Authors:  J Zalevsky; A J MacQueen; J B Duffy; K J Kemphues; A M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic sequence of a mutant strain of Caenorhabditis elegans with an altered recombination pattern.

Authors:  Ann M Rose; Nigel J O'Neil; Mikhail Bilenky; Yaron S Butterfield; Nawar Malhis; Stephane Flibotte; Martin R Jones; Marco Marra; David L Baillie; Steven J M Jones
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Multiple genetic pathways involving the Caenorhabditis elegans Bloom's syndrome genes him-6, rad-51, and top-3 are needed to maintain genome stability in the germ line.

Authors:  Chantal Wicky; Arno Alpi; Myriam Passannante; Ann Rose; Anton Gartner; Fritz Müller
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Etiology of Down syndrome: Evidence for consistent association among altered meiotic recombination, nondisjunction, and maternal age across populations.

Authors:  Sujoy Ghosh; Eleanor Feingold; Subrata Kumar Dey
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.