Literature DB >> 12454064

Crossover distribution and high interference for both the X chromosome and an autosome during oogenesis and spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Philip M Meneely1, Anna F Farago, Tate M Kauffman.   

Abstract

Regulation of both the number and the location of crossovers during meiosis is important for normal chromosome segregation. We used sequence-tagged site polymorphisms to examine the distribution of all crossovers on the X chromosome during oogenesis and on one autosome during both oogenesis and spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. The X chromosome has essentially one crossover during oogenesis, with only three possible double crossover exceptions among 220 recombinant X chromosomes. All three had one of the two crossovers in the same chromosomal interval, suggesting that crossovers in that interval do not cause interference. No other interval was associated with double crossovers. Very high interference was also found on an autosome during oogenesis, implying that each chromosome has only one crossover during oogenesis. During spermatogenesis, recombination on this autosome was reduced by approximately 30% compared to oogenesis, but the relative distribution of the residual crossovers was only slightly different. In contrast to previous results with other autosomes, no double crossover chromosomes were observed. Despite an increased frequency of nonrecombinant chromosomes, segregation of a nonrecombinant autosome during spermatogenesis appears to occur normally. This indicates that an achiasmate segregation system helps to ensure faithful disjunction of autosomes during spermatogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12454064      PMCID: PMC1462340     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  Crossover interference in the mouse.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Lucy B Rowe; Gary A Churchill; Ken Paigen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation.

Authors:  A F Dernburg; J W Sedat; R S Hawley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Synaptonemal complexes: structure and function.

Authors:  C Heyting
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 4.  How cells get the right chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Recombination between small X chromosome duplications and the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  R K Herman; C K Kari
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Meiotic mutants that cause a polar decrease in recombination on the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S A Broverman; P M Meneely
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Spontaneous X chromosome MI and MII nondisjunction events in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes have different recombinational histories.

Authors:  K E Koehler; C L Boulton; H E Collins; R L French; K C Herman; S M Lacefield; L D Madden; C D Schuetz; R S Hawley
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Meiosis-induced double-strand break sites determined by yeast chromatin structure.

Authors:  T C Wu; M Lichten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mutant rec-1 eliminates the meiotic pattern of crossing over in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  M C Zetka; A M Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Here, there, and everywhere: kinetochore function on holocentric chromosomes.

Authors:  A F Dernburg
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  47 in total

1.  Heterozygous insertions alter crossover distribution but allow crossover interference in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Marc Hammarlund; M Wayne Davis; Hung Nguyen; Dustin Dayton; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heterochromatin-mediated association of achiasmate homologs declines with age when cohesion is compromised.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi V Subramanian; Sharon E Bickel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Meiotic and mitotic recombination in meiosis.

Authors:  Kathryn P Kohl; Jeff Sekelsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A single unpaired and transcriptionally silenced X chromosome locally precludes checkpoint signaling in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line.

Authors:  Aimee Jaramillo-Lambert; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetics: Crossover control in two steps.

Authors:  Yonatan B Tzur; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  To Break or Not To Break: Sex Chromosome Hemizygosity During Meiosis in Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Mike V Van; Braden J Larson; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Sex Differences in the Recombination Landscape.

Authors:  Jason M Sardell; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes.

Authors:  Kentaro Nabeshima; Anne M Villeneuve; Kenneth J Hillers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me.

Authors:  Luke E Berchowitz; Gregory P Copenhaver
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Domain-specific regulation of recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans in response to temperature, age and sex.

Authors:  Jaclyn G Y Lim; Rachel R W Stine; Judith L Yanowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.