Literature DB >> 4625747

Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster.

B S Baker, A T Carpenter.   

Abstract

A total of 209 ethyl methanesulfonate-treated X chromosomes were screened for meiotic mutants that either (1) increased sex or fourth chromosome nondisjunction at either meiotic division in males; (2) allowed recombination in such males; (3) increased nondisjunction of the X chromosome at either meiotic division in females; or (4) caused such females, when mated to males heterozygous for Segregation-Distorter (SD) and a sensitive homolog to alter the strength of meiotic drive in males.-Twenty male-specific meiotic mutants were found. Though the rates of nondisjunction differed, all twenty mutants were qualitatively similar in that (1) they alter the disjunction of the X chromosome from the Y chromosome; (2) among the recovered sex-chromosome exceptional progeny, there is a large excess of those derived from nullo-XY as compared to XY gametes; (3) there is a negative correlation between the frequency of sex-chromosome exceptional progeny and the frequency of males among the regular progeny. In their effects on meiosis these mutants are similar to In(1)sc(4L)sc(8R), which is deleted for the basal heterochromatin. These mutants, however, have normal phenotypes and viabilities when examined as X/0 males, and furthermore, a mapping of two of the mutants places them in the euchromatin of the X chromosome. It is suggested that these mutants are in genes whose products are involved in insuring the proper functioning of the basal pairing sites which are deleted in In(1)sc(4L)sc(8R), and in addition that there is a close connection, perhaps causal, between the disruption of normal X-Y pairing (and, therefore, disjunction) and the occurrence of meiotic drive in the male.-Eleven mutants were found which increased nondisjunction in females. These mutants were characterized as to (1) the division at which they acted; (2) their effect on recombination; (3) their dominance; (4) their effects on disjunction of all four chromosome pairs. Five female mutants caused a nonuniform decrease in recombination, being most pronounced in distal regions, and an increase in first division nondisjunction of all chromosome pairs. Their behavior is consistent with the hypothesis that these mutants are defective in a process which is a precondition for exchange. Two female mutants were allelic and caused a uniform reduction in recombination for all intervals (though to different extents for the two alleles) and an increase in first-division nondisjunction of all chromosomes. Limited recombination data suggest that these mutants do not alter coincidence, and thus, following the arguments of Sandler et al. (1968), are defective in exchange rather than a precondiiton for exchange. A single female mutant behaves in a manner that is consistent with it being a defect in a gene whose functioning is essential for distributive pairing. Three of the female meiotic mutants cause abnormal chromosome behavior at a number of times in meiosis. Thus, nondisjunction at both meiotic divisions is increased, recombinant chromosomes nondisjoin, and there is a polarized alteration in recombination.-The striking differences between the types of control of meiosis in the two sexes is discussed and attention is drawn to the possible similarities between (1) the disjunction functions of exchange and the process specified by the chromosome-specific male mutants; and (2) the prevention of functional aneuploid gamete formation by distributive disjunction and meiotic drive.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 4625747      PMCID: PMC1212782     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of irradiated Drosophila populations for meiotic drive.

Authors:  E NOVITSKI; G D HANKS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1961-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Meiotic Loss of Unpaired Chromosomes in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  L Sandler; G Braver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Meiotic Drive in Natural Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. I. the Cytogenetic Basis of Segregation-Distortion.

Authors:  L Sandler; Y Hiraizumi; I Sandler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Nonexchange alignment: a meiotic process revealed by a synthetic meiotic mutant of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L G Robbins
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1971

5.  Evidence for position-effect suppression of the ribosomal RNA cistrons in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W K Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total
  138 in total

1.  mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; J J Sekelsky; G Tsang; R S Hawley; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Two genes required for meiotic recombination in Drosophila are expressed from a dicistronic message.

Authors:  H Liu; J K Jang; J Graham; K Nycz; K S McKim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Chromosomal position effects reveal different cis-acting requirements for rDNA transcription and sex chromosome pairing in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Briscoe; J E Tomkiel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein.

Authors:  S L Page; R S Hawley
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Recombinogenic effects of suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Thomas Westphal; Gunter Reuter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A T Carpenter
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Genetic control of chromosome breakage and rejoining in Drosophila melanogaster: spontaneous chromosome aberrations in X-linked mutants defective in DNA metabolism.

Authors:  M Gatti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Normal synaptonemal complex and abnormal recombination nodules in two alleles of the Drosophila meiotic mutant mei-W68.

Authors:  Adelaide T C Carpenter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Expression and DNA sequence of RED1, a gene required for meiosis I chromosome segregation in yeast.

Authors:  E A Thompson; G S Roeder
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1989-08

10.  An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic checkpoint control.

Authors:  Eric Staeva-Vieira; Siuk Yoo; Ruth Lehmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.