Literature DB >> 8597622

The effects of preoperative resorption and jaw anatomy on implant success. A report of 303 cases.

S L Bass1, R G Triplett.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to report the outcome of 1097 consecutively implanted endosteal implants (Brånemark) into 303 jaws, between September 1983 and May 1990. All implants were placed using the prescribed technique suggested by manufacturer, and were restored either with fixed or removable prosthesis. Alveolar bone resorption (quantity) was scored from lesser to greater degree by assigning a value of 1-5 to each jaw, and jaw anatomy was scored from 1-4, based on decreasing cortical and cancellous bone quality. The data were separated into fixed and removable prosthesis and analyzed to determine the correlation between success and the scored resorption and jaw anatomy, as well as implant position. Assessment demonstrated a maxillary success rate of 93.4% and a mandibular success rate of 97.2% over a 36-month period (mean). Results of correlations of success with jaw anatomy for both fixed and removable prosthesis revealed that bone quality 4 exhibited the greatest failure rate. Preoperative resorption values (1-5) had little effect on failure, and quality appears to influence failure more than quantity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 8597622     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020406.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

Review 1.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  3D finite element analysis to detect stress distribution: spiral family implants.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Luigi Paracchini; Guidi Riccardo; Stefano Fanali; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-04-24

3.  Lithium chloride enhances bone regeneration and implant osseointegration in osteoporotic conditions.

Authors:  Yifan Jin; Lihua Xu; Xiaohui Hu; Shixian Liao; Janak L Pathak; Jinsong Liu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Analysis of micromovements and peri-implant stresses and strains around ultra-short implants - A three-dimensional finite-element method study.

Authors:  Nida Sumra; Shrikar Desai; Rohit Kulshrestha; Khusbhu Mishra; Raahat Vikram Singh; Prachi Gaonkar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2021-07-01

5.  Three dimensional finite element analysis to detect stress distribution in spiral implants and surrounding bone.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Annalisa Palmieri; Francesca Farinella; Giorgio Brunelli; Francesco Carinci; Ambra Girardi; Giuseppe Spinelli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2009

6.  A 5-year retrospective clinical study of the Dentium implants.

Authors:  Jeong-Yol Lee; Hyo-Jin Park; Jong-Eun Kim; Yong-Geun Choi; Young-Soo Kim; Jung-Bo Huh; Sang-Wan Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  2D FEA of evaluation of micromovements and stresses at bone-implant interface in immediately loaded tapered implants in the posterior maxilla.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; Rika Singh; I Karthikeyan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-09

8.  Influence of thread pitch, helix angle, and compactness on micromotion of immediately loaded implants in three types of bone quality: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pan Ma; Wei Xiong; Baosheng Tan; Wei Geng; Jiaqiang Liu; Weihong Li; Dehua Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases.

Authors:  Rowland Agbara; Elizabeth Goetze; Felix Koch; Wilfred Wagner
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.