Literature DB >> 8596827

Primary breast cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathologic correlation.

S J Vinnicombe1, A D MacVicar, R L Guy, J P Sloane, T J Powles, G Knee, J E Husband.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To correlate changes depicted at mammography during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma with subsequent pathologic status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 107) underwent mammography before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prior to surgery. Four retrospectively determined grades of response at mammography included complete, mammographic (decreased size and/or density), stable disease, or progressive disease.
RESULTS: In 95 fully assessable patients, grade of response to chemotherapy was complete in eight (9%), mammographic in 78 (82%), stable disease in seven (7%), and progressive disease in two (2%). Before and after treatment, respectively, 64 (67%) and 20 (21%) masses were greater than 2 cm in bidimensional diameter. Response was not complete in any of the 44 (46%) cases of microcalcifications. At histologic examination after surgery in 95 fully assessable patients, five of eight patients with complete response were found to have residual tumor (three with an invasive component); eight were found to have no residual tumor (response in three was complete; in four, mammographic; and in one, stable disease).
CONCLUSION: Whereas mammograms in most patients showed some response to chemotherapy, prediction of pathologic outcome was not possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8596827     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  38 in total

Review 1.  FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  H-J Biersack; H Bender; H Palmedo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; J H Ahn; S-B Kim; K H Jung; G Gong; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Giovanni De Rosa; Stefano Cirillo; Vincenzo Marra; Nicoletta Biglia; Marco Gatti; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Longitudinal optical monitoring of blood flow in breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J M Cochran; S H Chung; A Leproux; W B Baker; D R Busch; A M DeMichele; J Tchou; B J Tromberg; A G Yodh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Laura A Biernat; Nat Pernick; Larry Tait; Judith Abrams; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Keune; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman; Abigail Hoffman; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Chemotherapeutic drug-specific alteration of microvascular blood flow in murine breast cancer as measured by diffuse correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gabriel Ramirez; Ashley R Proctor; Ki Won Jung; Tong Tong Wu; Songfeng Han; Russell R Adams; Jingxuan Ren; Daniel K Byun; Kelley S Madden; Edward B Brown; Thomas H Foster; Parisa Farzam; Turgut Durduran; Regine Choe
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Predicting Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6691 Trial of Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Bruce J Tromberg; Zheng Zhang; Anaïs Leproux; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Albert E Cerussi; Philip M Carpenter; Rita S Mehta; Darren Roblyer; Wei Yang; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue; Shudong Jiang; Peter A Kaufman; Arjun G Yodh; So Hyun Chung; Mitchell Schnall; Bradley S Snyder; Nola Hylton; David A Boas; Stefan A Carp; Steven J Isakoff; David Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Diffuse Optical Monitoring of the Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Regine Choe; Turgut Durduran
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.544

10.  Utility of FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kei Ogino; Masanobu Nakajima; Miyako Kakuta; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Satoru Yamaguchi; Takashi Tsuchioka; Keiichi Kubota; Setsu Sakamoto; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.