Literature DB >> 8596064

The discrepancy between echocardiography, cineventriculography and thermodilution. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction.

A Takenaka1, M Iwase, T Sobue, M Yokota.   

Abstract

We have often experienced disagreement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) between cineventriculography and echocardiography not performed simultaneously, and unnaturally hyperdynamic left ventricular wall motion. We determined EDV, ESV, stroke volume, and EF (with modified Simpson's rule) in 65 consecutive patients using 2-dimensional echocardiography with a 2.5 MHz, 128-element phased-array transducer within three days of cardiac catheterization and compared our results with those obtained by the thermodilution technique and biplane cineventriculography. Heart rate and stroke volume were significantly different among the three techniques: cineventriculography yielded the highest values. These findings suggest that patients may have been in a hyperadrenergic state caused by anxiety experienced during invasive cineventriculography and thermodilution examinations. Inter- and intraobserver variabilities for echocardiography differed little from the variability in cineventriculography. Although there were good correlations between echocardiographic and cineventriculographic findings for EDV (r = 0.67), ESV (r = 0.80), and EF (r = 0.78) by two independent observers, there was a lack of agreement for EDV, ESV, and EF. Echocardiographic EDV values were significantly lower than cineventriculographic values. When left ventricular function is good, the left ventricle tends to be hyperadrenergic and in a more hyperdynamic state with smaller ESV than echocardiographic values during cineventriculography. When left ventricular function is poor, the left ventricle tends to be influenced by the effect of the contrast medium and stress during the invasive examinations and in a more hypodynamic state with larger ESV than echocardiographic values during cineventriculography. The echocardiography is highly reproducible and may provide information that is not available from cineventriculography and thermodilution. Cineventriculography may provide another manifestation of cardiac reserve. In conclusion, we must take into account each peculiar property of the echocardiography, the cineventriculography, or the thermodilution technique when patients are examined with cardiac conditions by different methods at different days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8596064     DOI: 10.1007/bf01145194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  17 in total

1.  Left ventricular ejection fraction measured with Doppler color flow mapping techniques.

Authors:  A R Bengur; A R Snider; R P Vermilion; J C Freeland
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography.

Authors:  K W Carr; R L Engler; J R Forsythe; A D Johnson; B Gosink
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Determination of ventricular volume by radioisotope-angiography.

Authors:  C B Mullins; D T Mason; W L Ashburn; J Ross
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers.

Authors:  J D Mackenzie; N E Haites; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-01

6.  Thermodilution cardiac output: a critical analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Levett; R L Replogle
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  In vitro quantitation of canine left ventricular volume by phased-array sector scan.

Authors:  J N Schapira; M S Kohn; W L Beaver; R L Popp
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.869

9.  Value and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Authors:  M D Smith; B MacPhail; M R Harrison; S J Lenhoff; A N DeMaria
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Cardiac stroke volume during exercise measured by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with the thermodilution technique and evaluation of reproducibility.

Authors:  H Ihlen; K Endresen; S Golf; S Nitter-Hauge
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by monoplane cineventriculography, unenhanced echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chunjian Li; Dirk Lossnitzer; Hugo A Katus; Sebastian J Buss
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Preload-independent mechanisms contribute to increased stroke volume following large volume saline infusion in normal volunteers: a prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Ramon Anel; Eugene Bunnell; Sergio Zanotti; Kalim Habet; Cameron Haery; Stephanie Marshall; Mary Cheang; Alex Neumann; Amjad Ali; Clifford Kavinsky; Joseph E Parrillo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Is early ventricular dysfunction or dilatation associated with lower mortality rate in adult severe sepsis and septic shock? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen J Huang; Marek Nalos; Anthony S McLean
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 9.097

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.