Literature DB >> 8595463

The evolution of hospital utilization review methods in the United States.

J D Restuccia1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of utilization review (UR) methods that have been used in the United States and the direction UR is likely to take in the future. In contrast to the European studies reported in this issue, which consist primarily of empirical studies quantifying the magnitude of inappropriate hospital utilization, the focus of this paper is on the methods used to perform UR operationally. Particular attention will be paid to the predominant form of UR employed in the United States, concurrent review of the need for a hospital level of care, and on the criteria used to assess appropriateness of hospital admissions and days.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8595463     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  13 in total

1.  How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?

Authors:  N Kalant; M Berlinguet; J G Diodati; L Dragatakis; F Marcotte
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reducing hospital admissions.

Authors:  Sarah Purdy; Tom Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-05

3.  Validation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practice.

Authors:  U Werneke; H Smith; I J Smith; J Taylor; R MacFaul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Determining level of care appropriateness in the patient journey from acute care to rehabilitation.

Authors:  Christopher J Poulos; Christopher Magee; Guy Bashford; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  General practitioners' perceptions of the appropriateness and inappropriateness of out-of-hours calls.

Authors:  H Smith; V Lattimer; S George
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review?

Authors:  Christopher J Poulos; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-03-13

7.  Current level and determinants of inappropriate admissions to township hospitals under the new rural cooperative medical system in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yingchun Chen; Xiang Zhang; Liang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Predictors of inappropriate hospital stay: experience from Iran.

Authors:  Ali Asghar Ghods; Roghayeh Khabiri; Nayereh Raeisdana; Mehry Ansari; Nahid Hoshmand Motlagh; Malihe Sadeghi; Ehsan Zarei
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-11-17

9.  Admissions for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions - a useful measure of potentially preventable admission?

Authors:  Jo M Longman; Megan E Passey; Dan P Ewald; Elizabeth Rix; Geoffrey G Morgan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol.

Authors:  Wenwei Liu; Suwei Yuan; Fengqing Wei; Jing Yang; Zhe Zhang; Changbin Zhu; Jin Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.