Literature DB >> 8592957

Effects of a one-year high-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training program on bone mineral density in older women.

L A Pruitt1, D R Taaffe, R Marcus.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a 12-month resistance training program, of two different intensities, on bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy, older women. Twenty-six Caucasian women (aged 65-79 years) completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: high-intensity (HI; n = 8), low-intensity (LI; n = 7), and control (CON; n = 11). The active groups performed 10 exercises, 3 days/week under supervision. Exercise intensity was maintained at 80% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM) for the HI groups, and at 40% 1-RM for the LI group. The volume of work was maintained constant between the two groups by assigning the LI group twice as many repetitions for each exercise. Maximal muscular strength and BMD of the lumbar spine and total hip were measured at baseline and at 12 months. Strength was evaluated using the 1-RM method, and BMD was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Exercise session attendance was similar for the two groups (81.0% HI; 76.8% LI). Muscular strength improved in the exercisers compared with the CON group (p < or = 0.05). Percentage change in lumbar spine BMD was 0.7 +/- 1.9%, 0.5 +/- 2.4%, and -0.1 +/- 2.3% for the HI, LI, and CON groups, respectively. Percentage change in total hip BMD was 0.8 +/- 2.3% (HI), 1.0 +/- 1.7% (LI), and 0.9 +/- 1.3% (CON). Group differences in BMD change were not significant (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that high-intensity and low-intensity resistance training regimens effectively increase muscular strength, but not lumbar spine or total hip BMD, in healthy, older women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8592957     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  41 in total

Review 1.  Why rest stimulates bone formation: a hypothesis based on complex adaptive phenomenon.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Sandra L Poliachik; Brandon J Ausk; David A Sanford; Blair A Becker; Sundar Srinivasan
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle.

Authors:  Sundar Srinivasan; David A Weimer; Steven C Agans; Steven D Bain; Ted S Gross
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Is there a role for exercise in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures?

Authors:  O M Rutherford
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Strength training and detraining effects on muscular strength, anaerobic power, and mobility of inactive older men are intensity dependent.

Authors:  I G Fatouros; A Kambas; I Katrabasas; K Nikolaidis; A Chatzinikolaou; D Leontsini; K Taxildaris
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Building bone mass through exercise: could less be more?

Authors:  T S Gross; S Srinivasan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Loading and bone fragility.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  The effect of moderate impact exercise on skeletal integrity in master athletes.

Authors:  N F Velez; A Zhang; B Stone; S Perera; M Miller; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Potential of creatine supplementation for improving aging bone health.

Authors:  D G Candow; P D Chilibeck
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  The effects of differing resistance training modes on the preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Zhao; M Zhao; Z Xu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Enhancement of Flow-Induced AP-1 Gene Expression by Cyclosporin A Requires NFAT-Independent Signaling in Bone Cells.

Authors:  Leah E Worton; Ronald Y Kwon; Edith M Gardiner; Ted S Gross; Sundar Srinivasan
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.