Literature DB >> 15984410

Loading and bone fragility.

Ego Seeman1.   

Abstract

Data from retrospective and prospective observational and case-control studies suggest that activity is associated with reduced fracture risk, but consistently replicated bias may be responsible for this desired endpoint. Exercise during growth is likely to build a larger and stronger skeleton. However, cessation of exercise may erode the benefits. Modeling changes produced by exercise during growth may be permanent; remodeling changes may not be. Exercise during adulthood produces small increments in BMD or may prevent bone loss. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence of effect, but the null hypothesis that exercise has no effect on fracture rates in old age cannot be rejected by any published data. Proof requires demonstration of a reduction in spine and hip fractures in well-designed and well-executed prospective randomized studies; none exists. Blinded studies cannot be done, but open trials can and should be done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15984410     DOI: 10.1007/BF03026319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  128 in total

1.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; B L Strom; G Y Chiu; G Maislin; L A O'Brien; S Hoffman; F Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Aerobic exercise and bone density at the hip in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G A Kelley
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Preventing disability and falls in older adults: a population-based randomized trial.

Authors:  E H Wagner; A Z LaCroix; L Grothaus; S G Leveille; J A Hecht; K Artz; K Odle; D M Buchner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A randomized trial of physical rehabilitation for very frail nursing home residents.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; M B Gerety; D Kanten; J E Cornell; L A DeNino; L Chiodo; C Aguilar; M B O'Neil; J Rosenberg; R M Solis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall; I Persson; R Bergström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence. Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; S K Inouye; T M Gill; J T Doucette
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Childhood growth, physical activity, and peak bone mass in women.

Authors:  C Cooper; M Cawley; A Bhalla; P Egger; F Ring; L Morton; D Barker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Risk factors for injurious falls: a prospective study.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; S R Cummings; E S Hudes
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-09

9.  Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise.

Authors:  H H Jones; J D Priest; W C Hayes; C C Tichenor; D A Nagel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Bone mineral density after resumption of menses in amenorrheic athletes.

Authors:  B L Drinkwater; K Nilson; S Ott; C H Chesnut
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative bone anatomy of commonly used laboratory animals: implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  Cedo M Bagi; Edwin Berryman; Maria R Moalli
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.982

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.