Literature DB >> 8589605

Structure refinement with molecular dynamics and a Boltzmann-weighted ensemble.

J Fennen1, A E Torda, W F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

Time-averaging restraints in molecular dynamics simulations were introduced to account for the averaging implicit in spectroscopic data. Space- or molecule-averaging restraints have been used to overcome the fact that not all molecular conformations can be visited during the finite time of a simulation of a single molecule. In this work we address the issue of using the correct Boltzmann weighting for each member of an ensemble, both in time and in space. It is shown that the molecular- or space-averaging method is simple in theory, but requires a priori knowledge of the behaviour of a system. This is illustrated using a five-atom model system and the small cycle peptide analogue somatostatin. When different molecular conformers that are separated by energy barriers insurmountable on the time scale of a simulation contribute significantly to a measured NOE intensity, the use of space- or molecule-averaged distance restraints yields a more appropriate description of the measured data than conventional single-molecule refinement with or without application of time averaging.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8589605     DOI: 10.1007/bf00211780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  9 in total

1.  Refinement of the NMR structures for acyl carrier protein with scalar coupling data.

Authors:  Y Kim; J H Prestegard
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1990

2.  Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat.

Authors:  A E Torda; R M Scheek; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Accounting for molecular mobility in structure determination based on nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction data.

Authors:  W F van Gunsteren; R M Brunne; P Gros; R C van Schaik; C A Schiffer; A E Torda
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  The combined use of NMR, distance geometry, and restrained molecular dynamics for the conformational study of a cyclic somatostatin analogue.

Authors:  H Pepermans; D Tourwé; G Van Binst; R Boelens; R M Scheek; W F Van Gunsteren; R Kaptein
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  How is an NMR structure best defined? An analysis of molecular dynamics distance-based approaches.

Authors:  D A Pearlman
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Time- and ensemble-averaged direct NOE restraints.

Authors:  A M Bonvin; R Boelens; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  A dynamic model for the structure of acyl carrier protein in solution.

Authors:  Y Kim; J H Prestegard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-10-31       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Structure refinement using time-averaged J-coupling constant restraints.

Authors:  A E Torda; R M Brunne; T Huber; H Kessler; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Local structure due to an aromatic-amide interaction observed by 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in peptides related to the N terminus of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor.

Authors:  J Kemmink; C P van Mierlo; R M Scheek; T E Creighton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  Determination of the populations and structures of multiple conformers in an ensemble from NMR data: multiple-copy refinement of nucleic acid structures using floating weights.

Authors:  A Görler; N B Ulyanov; T L James
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  An improved structural characterisation of reduced French bean plastocyanin based on NMR data and local-elevation molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Denise Steiner; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Methods of NMR structure refinement: molecular dynamics simulations improve the agreement with measured NMR data of a C-terminal peptide of GCN4-p1.

Authors:  Jozica Dolenc; John H Missimer; Michel O Steinmetz; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  FINGAR: A new genetic algorithm-based method for fitting NMR data.

Authors:  D A Pearlman
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  On using oscillating time-dependent restraints in MD simulation.

Authors:  Bettina Keller; Markus Christen; Chris Oostenbrink; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Modeling aqueous solvation with semi-explicit assembly.

Authors:  Christopher J Fennell; Charles W Kehoe; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures?

Authors:  A M Bonvin; A T Brünger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  The dynamic NMR structure of the T psi C-loop: implications for the specificity of tRNA methylation.

Authors:  L J Yao; T L James; J T Kealey; D V Santi; U Schmitz
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Molecular modeling of the RNA binding N-terminal part of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus coat protein in solution with phosphate ions.

Authors:  D van der Spoel; K A Feenstra; M A Hemminga; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Scoring ensembles of docked protein:ligand interactions for virtual lead optimization.

Authors:  Janet L Paulsen; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.