Literature DB >> 10723994

Determination of the populations and structures of multiple conformers in an ensemble from NMR data: multiple-copy refinement of nucleic acid structures using floating weights.

A Görler1, N B Ulyanov, T L James.   

Abstract

A new algorithm is presented for determination of structural conformers and their populations based on NMR data. Restrained Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations or restrained energy minimizations are performed for several copies of a molecule simultaneously. The calculations are restrained with dipolar relaxation rates derived from measured NOE intensities via complete relaxation matrix analysis. The novel feature of the algorithm is that the weights of individual conformers are determined in every refinement step, by the quadratic programming algorithm, in such a way that the restraint energy is minimized. Its design ensures that the calculated populations of the individual conformers are based only on experimental restraints. Presence of internally inconsistent restraints is the driving force for determination of distinct multiple conformers. The method is applied to various simulated test systems. Conformational calculations on nucleic acids are carried out using generalized helical parameters with the program DNAminiCarlo. From different mixtures of A- and B-DNA, minor fractions as low as 10% could be determined with restrained energy minimization. For B-DNA with three local conformers (C2'-endo, O4'-exo, C3'-endo), the minor O4'-exo conformer could not be reliably determined using NOE data typically measured for DNA. The other two conformers, C2'-endo and C3'-endo, could be reproduced by Metropolis Monte Carlo simulated annealing. The behavior of the algorithm in various situations is analyzed, and a number of refinement protocols are discussed. Prior to application of this algorithm to each experimental system, it is suggested that the presence of internal inconsistencies in experimental data be ascertained. In addition, because the performance of the algorithm depends on the type of conformers involved and experimental data available, it is advisable to carry out test calculations with simulated data modeling each experimental system studied.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10723994     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008386726542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  26 in total

1.  A re-examination of the crystal structure of A-DNA using fiber diffraction data.

Authors:  R Chandrasekaran; M Wang; R G He; L C Puigjaner; M A Byler; R P Millane; S Arnott
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1989-06

2.  Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat.

Authors:  A E Torda; R M Scheek; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Small structural ensembles for a 17-nucleotide mimic of the tRNA T psi C-loop via fitting dipolar relaxation rates with the quadratic programming algorithm.

Authors:  U Schmitz; A Donati; T L James; N B Ulyanov; L Yao
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Determining local conformational variations in DNA. Nuclear magnetic resonance structures of the DNA duplexes d(CGCCTAATCG) and d(CGTCACGCGC) generated using back-calculation of the nuclear Overhauser effect spectra, a distance geometry algorithm and constrained molecular dynamics.

Authors:  W J Metzler; C Wang; D B Kitchen; R M Levy; A Pardi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures?

Authors:  A M Bonvin; A T Brünger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect: complete relaxation matrix analysis.

Authors:  B A Borgias; T L James
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Probability assessment of conformational ensembles: sugar repuckering in a DNA duplex in solution.

Authors:  N B Ulyanov; U Schmitz; A Kumar; T L James
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Statistical analysis of DNA duplex structural features.

Authors:  N B Ulyanov; T L James
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Structure refinement with molecular dynamics and a Boltzmann-weighted ensemble.

Authors:  J Fennen; A E Torda; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Solution-state structure of a DNA dodecamer duplex containing a Cis-syn thymine cyclobutane dimer, the major UV photoproduct of DNA.

Authors:  K McAteer; Y Jing; J Kao; J S Taylor; M A Kennedy
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-10-09       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  9 in total

1.  Docking to RNA via root-mean-square-deviation-driven energy minimization with flexible ligands and flexible targets.

Authors:  Christophe Guilbert; Thomas L James
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Conformational dynamics in mixed alpha/beta-oligonucleotides containing polarity reversals: a molecular dynamics study using time-averaged restraints.

Authors:  J M Aramini; A Mujeeb; N B Ulyanov; M W Germann
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Refined structure of a flexible heptasaccharide using 1H-13C and 1H-1H NMR residual dipolar couplings in concert with NOE and long range scalar coupling constants.

Authors:  M Martin-Pastor; C A Bush
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Dynamic NMR structures of [Rp]- and [Sp]-phosphorothioated DNA-RNA hybrids: is flexibility required for RNase H recognition?

Authors:  Marco Tonelli; Nikolai B Ulyanov; Todd M Billeci; Boleslaw Karwowski; Piotr Guga; Wojciech J Stec; Thomas L James
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Overall structure and sugar dynamics of a DNA dodecamer from homo- and heteronuclear dipolar couplings and 31P chemical shift anisotropy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Wu; Frank Delaglio; Nico Tjandra; Victor B Zhurkin; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Molecular dynamics re-refinement of two different small RNA loop structures using the original NMR data suggest a common structure.

Authors:  Niel M Henriksen; Darrell R Davis; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  High-resolution NMR structure of an AT-rich DNA sequence.

Authors:  Nikolai B Ulyanov; William R Bauer; Thomas L James
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  The intrinsic mechanics of B-DNA in solution characterized by NMR.

Authors:  Akli Ben Imeddourene; Xiaoqian Xu; Loussiné Zargarian; Christophe Oguey; Nicolas Foloppe; Olivier Mauffret; Brigitte Hartmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Probing the residual structure in avian prion hexarepeats by CD, NMR and MD techniques.

Authors:  Luigi Russo; Luca Raiola; Maria Anna Campitiello; Antonio Magrì; Roberto Fattorusso; Gaetano Malgieri; Giuseppe Pappalardo; Diego La Mendola; Carla Isernia
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.