Literature DB >> 8588650

Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction.

J J Rosowski1, S N Merchant.   

Abstract

Existing mechanical and acoustic models of the human middle ear are used to investigate the expected performance of various middle ear reconstructive procedures. Although the results of these analyses generally are consistent with observed surgical results, such an analytic approach enables the formation of some simple rules for maximizing middle ear function after stapedectomy and tympanomastoid surgery. Model analyses predict the following: (1) stapes prostheses of 0.6 to 0.8 mm in diameter produce air-bone gaps of less than 12 dB; smaller diameter prostheses produce larger air-bone gaps; (2) the mass of a stapedectomy or ossicular replacement prosthesis can be 16 times greater than that of the stapes with little effect on the hearing result; (3) the volume of the middle ear air spaces after tympanomastoid surgery should be at least 0.5 cc for optimal acoustic results; and (4) in a type IV tympanoplasty, the effectiveness of the round window graft (acoustic shield) is an important parameter determining the hearing result; the shield should be as impedant (stiff) as possible for optimal postoperative hearing. The model framework described in this report hopefully can be used to investigate the effect of variations in other surgical and help define new procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  27 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of laser-Doppler vibrometry in conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Ritvik P Mehta; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Reconstructive methods in hearing disorders - surgical methods.

Authors:  Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

3.  Rotational tomography of the normal and reconstructed middle ear in temporal bones: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ch Offergeld; J Kromeier; A Aschendorff; W Maier; Th Klenzner; Th Beleites; Th Zahnert; J Schipper; R Laszig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery: from bench to bedside].

Authors:  C Offergeld
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Clinical investigation of flat panel CT following middle ear reconstruction: a study of 107 patients.

Authors:  K Zaoui; J Kromeier; M Neudert; T Beleites; T Zahnert; R Laszig; C Offergeld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  A Review of Surgical Nuances and Outcomes of the Reverse Stapedotomy.

Authors:  Anup Singh; David Victor Kumar Irugu; Rajeev Kumar; Hitesh Verma
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 7.  [Coupling of active middle ear implants-biomechanical aspects].

Authors:  M Bornitz; N Lasurashvili; M Neudert; T Beleites; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Evaluation of functional results of CWD surgery with ossicular replacement prosthesis due to cholesteatoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  Selcuk Ucar; Mete Iseri; Murat Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Osteoplastic atticoantrotomy with autologous bone chips and a bony attic strut in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Eckard Gehrking
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications.

Authors:  Christian Offergeld; Jan Kromeier; Saumil N Merchant; Nicoloz Lasurashvili; Marcus Neudert; Matthias Bornitz; Roland Laszig; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.