Literature DB >> 8585990

P1 clones from Drosophila melanogaster as markers to study the chromosomal evolution of Muller's A element in two species of the obscura group of Drosophila.

C Segarra1, E R Lozovskaya, G Ribó, M Aguadé, D L Hartl.   

Abstract

Thirty P1 clones from the X chromosome (Muller's A element) of Drosophila melanogaster were cross-hybridized in situ to Drosophila subobscura and Drosophila pseudoobscura polytene chromosomes. An additional recombinant phage lambda Dsuby was also used as a marker. Twenty-three (77%) of the P1 clones gave positive hybridization on D. pseudoobscura chromosomes but only 16 (53%) did so with those of D. subobscura. Eight P1 clones gave more than one hybridization signal on D. pseudoobscura and/or D. subobscura chromosomes. All P1 clones and lambda Dsuby hybridized on Muller's A element (X chromosome) of D. subobscura. In contrast, only 18 P1 clones and lambda Dsuby hybridized on Muller's A element (XL chromosomal arm) of D. pseudoobscura; 4 additional P1 clones hybridized on Muller's D element (XR chromosomal arm) of this species and the remaining P1 clone gave one hybridization signal on each arm of the X chromosome. This latter clone may contain one breakpoint of a pericentric inversion that may account for the interchange of genetic material between Muller's A and D elements in D. pseudoobscura. In contrast to the rare interchange of genetic material between chromosomal elements, profound differences in the order and spacing of markers were detected between D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura and D. subobscura. In fact, the number of chromosomal segments delimited by identical markers and conserved between pairwise comparisons is small. Therefore, extensive reorganization within Muller's A element has been produced during the divergence of the three species. Rough estimates of the number of cytologically detectable inversions contributing to differentiation of Muller's A element were obtained. The most reliable of these estimates is that obtained from the D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster comparison since a greater number of markers have been mapped in both species. Tentatively, one inversion breakpoint about every 200 kb has been produced and fixed during the divergence of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8585990     DOI: 10.1007/bf00347695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  14 in total

1.  A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Montgomery; B Charlesworth; C H Langley
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Developmental studies in Drosophila. 3. The puffing patterns of the salivary gland chromosomes of D pseudoobscura.

Authors:  A J Stocker; C D Kastritsis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; B A Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular organization of the X chromosome in different species of the obscura group of Drosophila.

Authors:  C Segarra; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Towards a Drosophila genome map.

Authors:  D L Hartl; J W Ajioka; H Cai; A R Lohe; E R Lozovskaya; D A Smoller; I W Duncan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Structural changes in the antennapedia complex of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  F M Randazzo; M A Seeger; C A Huss; M A Sweeney; J K Cecil; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Integrated maps of the Drosophila genome: progress and prospects.

Authors:  F C Kafatos; C Louis; C Savakis; D M Glover; M Ashburner; A J Link; I Sidén-Kiamos; R D Saunders
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Drosophila genome project: one-hit coverage in yeast artificial chromosomes.

Authors:  J W Ajioka; D A Smoller; R W Jones; J P Carulli; A E Vellek; D Garza; A J Link; I W Duncan; D L Hartl
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Molecular phylogeny and genome evolution in the Drosophila virilis species group: duplications of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene.

Authors:  D I Nurminsky; E N Moriyama; E R Lozovskaya; D L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genome structure and evolution in Drosophila: applications of the framework P1 map.

Authors:  D L Hartl; D I Nurminsky; R W Jones; E R Lozovskaya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  26 in total

1.  Divergence between the Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis genome sequences in relation to chromosomal inversions.

Authors:  Mohamed A F Noor; David A Garfield; Stephen W Schaeffer; Carlos A Machado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Molecular organization of the Drosophila melanogaster Adh chromosomal region in D. repleta and D. buzzatii, two distantly related species of the Drosophila subgenus.

Authors:  J González; E Betrán; M Ashburner; A Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives.

Authors:  R L Wang; J Wakeley; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Dorcas J Orengo; Eva Puerma; Montserrat Papaceit; Carmen Segarra; Montserrat Aguadé
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Toward a physical map of Drosophila buzzatii. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic dna polymorphisms and sequence-tagged site landmarks.

Authors:  H Laayouni; M Santos; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Differentiation of Muller's chromosomal elements D and E in the obscura group of Drosophila.

Authors:  C Segarra; G Ribó; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Chromosomal elements evolve at different rates in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josefa González; José María Ranz; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Stephen W Schaeffer; Susan M Russo; Mu Xu; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Polytene chromosomal maps of 11 Drosophila species: the order of genomic scaffolds inferred from genetic and physical maps.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer; Arjun Bhutkar; Bryant F McAllister; Muneo Matsuda; Luciano M Matzkin; Patrick M O'Grady; Claudia Rohde; Vera L S Valente; Montserrat Aguadé; Wyatt W Anderson; Kevin Edwards; Ana C L Garcia; Josh Goodman; James Hartigan; Eiko Kataoka; Richard T Lapoint; Elena R Lozovsky; Carlos A Machado; Mohamed A F Noor; Montserrat Papaceit; Laura K Reed; Stephen Richards; Tania T Rieger; Susan M Russo; Hajime Sato; Carmen Segarra; Douglas R Smith; Temple F Smith; Victor Strelets; Yoshiko N Tobari; Yoshihiko Tomimura; Marvin Wasserman; Thomas Watts; Robert Wilson; Kiyohito Yoshida; Therese A Markow; William M Gelbart; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.