Literature DB >> 8585401

Perinatal outcomes: a comparison between family physicians and obstetricians.

M E Deutchman1, D Sills, P D Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared obstetrician and family physician patient population demographics, obstetric outcomes, delivery methods, and medical risk factors.
METHODS: Obstetricians and family practice faculty and residents provided delivery services at an urban community hospital. A retrospective case study of all deliveries by obstetrician-gynecologists and family physicians in a 20-month period was analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square analysis, logistic regression, and power analysis. A modified risk score analysis was completed on all patients to assess comparability between the obstetrician and family physician patients.
RESULTS: Risk score analysis of the two patient populations demonstrated no difference in high-risk patients (P = 0.102). Family physicians' patients had a lower incidence of Cesarean section, use of forceps, diagnosis of cephalopelvic disproportion, and low-birth-weight babies. They had a higher incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery, vaginal birth after previous Cesarean section, and vacuum extraction use. The overall Cesarean section rate for family physicians was 15.4 percent, compared with 26.5 percent for obstetricians.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the high-quality outcomes of perinatal care provided by family physicians. They also provide evidence for training and privileging family physicians to perform their own Cesarean sections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8585401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract        ISSN: 0893-8652


  9 in total

1.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Ann Kelly; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  To Count Heads or to Count Services? Comparing Population-to-Physician Methods with Utilization-Based Methods for Physician Workforce Planning: A Case Study in a Remote Rural Administrative Region of British Columbia.

Authors:  Lorne Verhulst; Christopher B Forrest; Mike McFadden
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-05

3.  Family physicians in the maternity care workforce: factors influencing declining trends.

Authors:  Sebastian T Tong; Laura A Makaroff; Imam M Xierali; James C Puffer; Warren P Newton; Andrew W Bazemore
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-11

4.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

5.  Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable.

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Richard M Cullen; Alvin Simms; Shabnam Asghari; Joan Crane; Peizhong Peter Wang; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Challenges Faced by Family Physicians Providing Advanced Maternity Care.

Authors:  Aimee R Eden; Lars E Peterson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-06

8.  A Native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate?

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Rebecca Leeman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Determinants of rural-urban differences in health care provider visits among women of reproductive age in the United States.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Ashley H Hirai; Ching-Ching Claire Lin; John E Snyder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.