Literature DB >> 8584381

Calf blood pressure: clinical implications and correlations with arm blood pressure in infants and young children.

M S Crapanzano1, W B Strong, I R Newman, R L Hixon, D Casal, C W Linder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Indirect measurement of lower extremity blood pressure is often used in the clinical setting, although normative data after the newborn period are not readily available.
METHODS: Indirect blood pressure (BP) measurement was obtained in the right arms and right calves of 148 healthy infants and young children 2 weeks to 3 years of age. All measurements were made using an oscillometric device. The infants and children are quiet or asleep and in the supine position. A BP cuff of proper size was chosen. Three measurements were made in both extremities; the average of the second and third measurements was used for all analyses.
RESULTS: Age correlated better with calf systolic blood pressure (SBPc) than with arm SBP (SBPa) (r = .52 vs .17). Calf diastolic blood pressure (DBPc) and calf mean blood pressure (MBPc) correlated moderately poorly with age (r = .37 and .39, respectively). There was no order effect. SBPc correlated best with height (r = .53), then age (r = .52), and, finally, weight (r = .51). The correlation between BPc and BPa was moderately low. The correlation of SBPc with SBPa was r = .46; that of DBPc with DBPa was r = .37; and that of MBPc with MBPa was r = .41. From birth to 6 months, SBPc was slightly lower than SBPa (1 to 3 mm Hg). SBPc increased linearly relative to SBPa and began to exceed SBPa at 6 months of age. The pattern of DBP and MBP was similar. Wide variability of blood pressure parameters was noted between the infants and children at all ages.
CONCLUSIONS: Reference data are presented for BPc and the difference between BPc and BPa in healthy infants and children from 2 weeks to 3 years of age. BPc is not equivalent to BPa and should not be arbitrarily substituted. Because of the wide variability among healthy infants and children, SBPc measurements should be interpreted with caution when evaluating for coarctation of the aorta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8584381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  5 in total

1.  Differences in Blood Pressure in Infants After General Anesthesia Compared to Awake Regional Anesthesia (GAS Study-A Prospective Randomized Trial).

Authors:  M E McCann; D E Withington; S J Arnup; A J Davidson; N Disma; G Frawley; N S Morton; G Bell; R W Hunt; D C Bellinger; D M Polaner; A Leo; A R Absalom; B S von Ungern-Sternberg; F Izzo; P Szmuk; V Young; S G Soriano; J C de Graaff
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Comparison of arm and calf automatic noninvasive blood pressures in pediatric intensive care patients.

Authors:  Kathleen Schell; Eileen Briening; Ruth Lebet; Kelly Pruden; Steven Rawheiser; Barbara Jackson
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  Use of pulse oximetry for blood pressure measurement after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A J Movius; S L Bratton; G K Sorensen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Does measurement of four-limb blood pressures at birth improve detection of aortic arch anomalies?

Authors:  N Patankar; N Fernandes; K Kumar; V Manja; S Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Can we use the ankle non-invasive blood pressure during otolaryngologic surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Sidi Driss El Jaouhari; Mohamed Meziane; Jalal Kessouati; Rachid Razine; Abdelhamid Jaafari; Mustapha Bensghir
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-05-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.