Literature DB >> 8583814

Comparison of hemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography.

M B Izzat1, I Birdi, P Wilde, A J Bryan, G D Angelini.   

Abstract

Dobutamine stress Doppler echocardiography was used to compare the hemodynamic performance of two small aortic bileaflet prostheses. Nineteen patients (14 female, mean age 64 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement with 21 mm bileaflet valve prostheses (St. Jude Medical valve, n = 9, or CarboMedics valve, n = 10) were studied. Dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and increased to 10 and 20 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 at 15-minute intervals. Under maximum stress, heart rate and cardiac output increased by 70% and 120%, respectively, and mean arterial blood pressure decreased by 9%. Pulsed-wave and continuous-wave Doppler studies were performed at rest and at the end of each stage. Velocity ratio, effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of the valve were calculated, and peak and mean velocities and pressure drops across the prostheses were measured. Dobutamine infusion produced similar increases in cardiac output in all patients. Effective orifice areas, discharge coefficients, and performance indexes were comparable for the two valve groups both at rest and maximum stress. Transvalvular velocities and pressure drops were also similar in the two valve groups. Transvalvular pressure drops were also comparable in patients with large body surface area. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is useful in the evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of prosthetic heart valves. St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm prostheses have equally favorable hemodynamic performances in most patients under conditions of high cardiac output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8583814     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70450-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  [Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve].

Authors:  T Shimabukuro; Y Takeuchi; A Gomi; H Nakatani; Y Suda; K Kono; N Nagano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12

2.  Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots.

Authors:  J R González-Juanatey; M V Fernández; F G Sampedro; J M García-Acuña; J B García-Bengoechea; A A Cendon; M G de La Peña
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  A turbulence in vitro assessment of On-X and St Jude Medical prostheses.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Pablo Maureira; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  The Scandinavian multicenter hemodynamic evaluation of the SJM Regent aortic valve.

Authors:  Jon Offstad; Kai Andersen; Per Paulsson; Jesper Andreasson; Ulf Kjellman; Oluf Lundblad; Karl Gunnar Engstrøm; Rune Haaverstad; Jan L Svennevig
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Giovanni Minardi; Carla Manzara; Vittorio Creazzo; Daniele Maselli; Giovanni Casali; Giovanni Pulignano; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Early hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta™ surgical bioprosthesis aortic valve in Indian patient population: 12 month outcomes of the EVEREST post-market study.

Authors:  Gopichand Mannam; Yugal Mishra; Rajan Modi; Alla Gopala Krishna Gokhale; Rajan Sethuratnam; Kaushal Pandey; Rajneesh Malhotra; Sumit Anand; Anushreeta Borah; Sushan Mukhopadhyay; Dhiren Shah; Tek Singh Mahant
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.