Literature DB >> 8583602

The obstructive effect of a urethral catheter.

J M Reynard1, C Lim, S Swami, P Abrams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effect of a urethral catheter on pressure-flow relationships of the urethra has important implications for the practice to this question in the past in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. We assessed the obstructive effect of an 8 Ch. urethral catheter in men who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During combined pressure-flow studies 59 men completed 2 voids of similar volume with and without a urethral catheter in situ. Maximum flow rate, detrusor pressure at maximum flow and the group of specific urethral resistance factor were measured and compared between these 2 voids.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in maximum flow rate between voids (with catheter 9.1 ml. per second versus without catheter 8.6 ml. per second). Although detrusor pressure was significantly greater with the urethral catheter in situ (80 versus 67 cm. water), voids (with catheter 42.1 cm, water versus without catheter 36.6 cm water).
CONCLUSIONS: A 8 Ch. catheter does not appear to have a significant obstructive effect in the urethra. This finding has important implications for the practice and interpretation of pressure-flow studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8583602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Decreased maximum flow rate during intubated flow is not only due to urethral catheter in situ.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini; Gilberte Robain; Dorothée S Hennebelle; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The effect of a 6 Fr catheter in women: Are they obstructive?

Authors:  Patrick Richard; Nydia Icaza Ordonez; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  A 15-year retrospective review of urodynamic studies in children at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape town, South Africa.

Authors:  Thembisile Dintle Mosalakatane; Mignon McCulloch; Peter Nourse; Ashton Coetzee; Anne Wright; Jeanette Raad; John Lazarus; Justin Howlett
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 4.  The influence of intubation on urinary flow parameters in pressure-flow study and its significance for urodynamic diagnosis.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Shengfei Xu; Jiang Chen; Xiaoyu Wu; Zhong Chen; Guanghui Du
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 5.  Current concepts and controversies in urodynamics.

Authors:  C E Kelly; R J Krane
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  The effect of a 6 Fr catheter on flow rate in men.

Authors:  Patrick Richard; Nydia Icaza Ordonez; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-10

7.  Correlation between voiding dysfunction symptoms and uroflowmetry in women suffering from stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Katelyne Hubeaux; Xavier Deffieux; Marylène Jousse; Gérard Amarenco
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-07

8.  A quantitative comparison between free uroflow variables and urodynamic data, and the effect of the size of urodynamic catheters on its interpretation.

Authors:  Adittya K Sharma; Ali Poonawala; G N Girish; A J Kamath; R Keshavmurthy; N H Nagaraja; G K Venkatesh; C S Ratkal
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-27

9.  Impact of urethral catheterization on uroflow during pressure-flow study.

Authors:  Bi Song Zhu; Hui Chuan Jiang; Yuan Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.