Literature DB >> 22722647

Decreased maximum flow rate during intubated flow is not only due to urethral catheter in situ.

Françoise A Valentini1, Gilberte Robain, Dorothée S Hennebelle, Pierre P Nelson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We used the Valentini-Besson-Nelson (VBN) mathematical micturition model to analyze the potential obstructive effect of a 7-F transurethral catheter on the voiding process during intubated flow (IF) in women. Our hypothesis was that incomplete sphincter relaxation leads to residual sphincter pressure.
METHODS: We reviewed a urodynamic database of women referred for evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Exclusion criteria were neurological disease or grade ≥2 prolapse. Eligible women underwent free uroflow (FF-1) before cystometry, an IF (7-F urethral catheter), and a second FF (FF-2) at the end of the session. Interpreted flows were restricted to voided volumes ≥100 ml and continuous flow patterns. Analysis of FF and IF was made using the VBN model.
RESULTS: Among 472 women, 157 met the inclusion criteria. The effect of the urethral catheter was geometric only in 60 (38.2 %) patients. An additional effect, identified as incomplete sphincter relaxation, was observed in 97 (61.9 %) patients. Among this second group, the same residual sphincter excitation was found for 30 (30.97 %) patients during FF-2.
CONCLUSION: When comparing IF with FF with the VBN model, the decrease in maximum flow rate (Q(max)) did not appear to result only from the geometric effect of the catheter but from incomplete sphincter relaxation during voiding, possibly because of patient's anxiety or a urethral reflex induced by the presence of the catheter. These findings emphasize the need to perform an FF before the IF to strengthen the reliability of conclusions of a urodynamic investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722647     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1856-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  14 in total

1.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Impact of different sized catheters on pressure-flow studies in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Elisabetta Costantini; Luigi Mearini; Sauro Biscotto; Antonella Giannantoni; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  The influence of a urethral catheter and age on recorded urinary flow rates in healthy women.

Authors:  S Sørensen; M Jønler; U B Knudsen; J C Djurhuus
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1989

4.  Detrusor pressure uroflowmetry studies in women: effect of 4 Fr transurethral.

Authors:  Eugenio Di Grazia; Salvatore Bartolotta; Federico Nicolosi; Dario Nicolosi
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2002-09

5.  The mechanics of the urethra and of micturition.

Authors:  D J Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1973-10

6.  The obstructive effect of a urethral catheter.

Authors:  J M Reynard; C Lim; S Swami; P Abrams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Catheter as source of error in urodynamic study.

Authors:  M Koraitim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  A mathematical micturition model to restore simple flow recordings in healthy and symptomatic individuals and enhance uroflow interpretation.

Authors:  F A Valentini; G R Besson; P P Nelson; P E Zimmern
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Effect of different sized transurethral catheters on pressure-flow studies in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Carlo Vecchioli Scaldazza; Carolina Morosetti
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Differences between the data from free flow and intubated flow in women with urinary incontinence. What do they mean?

Authors:  Françoise Valentini; Brigitte Marti; Gilberte Robain; Pierre Nelson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  12 in total

1.  Active opening out of the urethra and the Valentini-Besson-Nelson mathematical model: response to comment by Petros and Bush.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Active opening out of the urethra questions the basis of the Valentini-Besson-Nelson mathematical model.

Authors:  P E P Petros; M Bush
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Identification of experimental bladder sensitivity among dysmenorrhea sufferers.

Authors:  Kevin M Hellman; Avisek Datta; Nicole D Steiner; Julia N Kane Morlock; Ellen F Garrison; Daniel J Clauw; Frank F Tu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Functional effect of transient transurethral catheterization on micturition in women: comment.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Computing maximum flow rates.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Comment on "Detrusor pressures in urodynamic studies during voiding in women".

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Are the measurements of water-filled and air-charged catheters the same in urodynamics?

Authors:  G Alessandro Digesu; Alexandros Derpapas; Penny Robshaw; Gopalan Vijaya; Caroline Hendricken; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  The influence of intubation on urinary flow parameters in pressure-flow study and its significance for urodynamic diagnosis.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Shengfei Xu; Jiang Chen; Xiaoyu Wu; Zhong Chen; Guanghui Du
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats.

Authors:  Kristine Janssen; Kangli Deng; Steve J A Majerus; Dan Li Lin; Brett Hanzlicek; Robert S Butler; Carl H van der Vaart; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  A quantitative comparison between free uroflow variables and urodynamic data, and the effect of the size of urodynamic catheters on its interpretation.

Authors:  Adittya K Sharma; Ali Poonawala; G N Girish; A J Kamath; R Keshavmurthy; N H Nagaraja; G K Venkatesh; C S Ratkal
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.