Literature DB >> 23826045

The effect of a 6 Fr catheter in women: Are they obstructive?

Patrick Richard1, Nydia Icaza Ordonez, Le Mai Tu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a 6 Fr transurethral catheter on the uroflowmetry and to assess whether it potentially contributes to the bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in women.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 1367 women who underwent an urodynamic study. We included patients with a non-invasive free-flow study (NIFFS) and pressure flow study (PFS) performed through a 6 Fr double lumen transurethral catheter.
RESULTS: In total, 120 women met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Mean maximal flow rate (Qmax) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the NIFFS (27.2±11.1 mL/s) than in the PFS (19.3±10.6 mL/s). The mean difference between both Qmax was 7.9±12.0 mL/s. Of these women, 92.3% (24/26) with a Qmax <12 mL/s during PFS were found to have a Qmax ≥12 mL/s during the NIFFS. Ten of the 72 women with an available Pdet.Qmax were deemed to have a BOO according to the PFS and all of them had a Qmax >12 mL/s during the NIFFS. Of the 10 patients, only 2 reported obstructive symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The presence of 6 Fr transurethral catheters alters the PFS and results in a significant reduction of the Qmax in patients who voided more than 250 mL. We believe that NIFFS should be performed in all patients before any urethral manipulation to lower a possible overdiagnosis of BOO and findings should always be correlated to clinical symptoms.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23826045      PMCID: PMC3699079          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  21 in total

1.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Impact of different sized catheters on pressure-flow studies in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Elisabetta Costantini; Luigi Mearini; Sauro Biscotto; Antonella Giannantoni; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  [Suprapubic puncture: preferable to transurethral catheterization for pressure-flow determination in BPH patients].

Authors:  Shan-Chao Zhao; Peng Zhang; Zhao-Ming Huang; Yi Zuo; Xiang-Ming Mao; Shao-Bin Zheng
Journal:  Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue       Date:  2008-11

4.  Spontaneous versus intubated flow in male patients.

Authors:  G Lose; P Thunedborg; H Colstrup; L Jørgensen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Male peak urinary flow rate: relationships to volume voided and age.

Authors:  G W Drach; T N Layton; W J Binard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The obstructive effect of a urethral catheter.

Authors:  J M Reynard; C Lim; S Swami; P Abrams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pressure flow analysis may aid in identifying women with outflow obstruction.

Authors:  G E Lemack; P E Zimmern
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Urodynamic parameters for the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in women.

Authors:  Hann-Chorng Kuo
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Differences between the data from free flow and intubated flow in women with urinary incontinence. What do they mean?

Authors:  Françoise Valentini; Brigitte Marti; Gilberte Robain; Pierre Nelson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Abnormal urethral compliance in females diagnosis, results and treatment. Preliminary study.

Authors:  J G Susset; G M Ghoniem; C H Regnier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Are urodynamics still useful?

Authors:  Stephen S Steele
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Computing maximum flow rates.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Detrusor pressures in urodynamic studies during voiding in women.

Authors:  Satoru Kira; Takahiko Mitsui; Hideki Kobayashi; Yaburu Haneda; Norifumi Sawada; Masayuki Takeda
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.894

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.