Literature DB >> 8583205

Concurrent-schedule performance in dairy cows: persistent undermatching.

T M Foster1, W Temple, B Robertson, V Nair, A Poling.   

Abstract

Performance of dairy cows responding under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules of food delivery was examined, with results analyzed in terms of the generalized matching equation. In Experiment 1, bias measures indicated that crushed barley was preferred over meatmeal when these foods were available under the alternative schedules. For whole-session data, substantial undermatching of response and time-allocation ratios to obtained reinforcement ratios was evident. Postreinforcement pause time ratios approximately matched obtained reinforcement rates. Subtracting these times from total time-allocation values yielded net time-allocation ratios that undermatched obtained reinforcement ratios to a greater degree than did whole-session time-allocation ratios. In Experiment 2, substantial undermatching was evident when the same foods (hay for 2 cows, crushed barley for 2 others) were available under the alternative schedules. Food-related activities and other defined behavior not related to food were quantified by direct observation, and were found to occupy a substantial proportion (roughly 40% to 80%) of experimental sessions. Subtracting the time spent in these activities from the time allocated to each component schedule did not reduce the degree of undermatching obtained. Across all conditions in both experiments, slopes of regression lines relating behavioral outputs to environmental inputs characteristically were below 0.6, which agrees with prior findings and suggests that, contrary to suggestions in the literature, undermatching in dairy cows is not the result of using different foods under alternative schedules or differential pausing under those schedules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8583205      PMCID: PMC1350063          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  A method for combining occurrence and nonoccurrence interobserver agreement scores.

Authors:  F C Harris; B B Lahey
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: Plastic pipes, wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels as enrichment items.

Authors:  A L Bradshaw; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent schedule assessment of food preference in cows.

Authors:  L R Matthews; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavior analysis and farm animal welfare.

Authors:  T M Foster; W Temple; A Poling
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Making sense of sensitivity in the human operant literature.

Authors:  G J Madden; P N Chase; J H Joyce
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.