Literature DB >> 16812635

Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: Plastic pipes, wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels as enrichment items.

A L Bradshaw, A Poling.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether simple additions to the home cages of rats made those cages preferable to standard housing arrangements. Results indicated that most rats preferred cages with wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels to otherwise identical cages without these items. Wood chips were not, however, practical with the cages used in the present study. Plastic pipes caused no problems but were not preferred by most animals. Both wood platforms and paper towels created no problems and appeared to be useful as enrichment items. The latter were preferred to the former in a direct comparison.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 16812635      PMCID: PMC1323058          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Editorial.

Authors:  E Segal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The relationships between subject and experimenter (Editorial).

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Human rights and animal welfare.

Authors:  D M Feeney
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1987-06

Review 4.  The value of behavioral research on animals.

Authors:  N E Miller
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1985-04

Review 5.  Alternatives to the use of animals in psychological research.

Authors:  G G Gallup; S D Suarez
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1985-10

6.  Psychological well-being of primates in captivity.

Authors:  M A Novak; S J Suomi
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1988-10
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Impact of Environmental Enrichment Devices on NTP In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Sheba R Churchill; Daniel L Morgan; Grace E Kissling; Gregory S Travlos; Angela P King-Herbert
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Concurrent-schedule performance in dairy cows: persistent undermatching.

Authors:  T M Foster; W Temple; B Robertson; V Nair; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effects of early life adversity on growth, maturation, and steroid hormones in male and female rats.

Authors:  Samantha R Eck; Cory S Ardekani; Madeleine Salvatore; Sandra Luz; Eric D Kim; Charleanne M Rogers; Arron Hall; Demetrius E Lee; Sydney T Famularo; Seema Bhatnagar; Debra A Bangasser
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Conventional laboratory housing increases morbidity and mortality in research rodents: results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Cait; Alissa Cait; R Wilder Scott; Charlotte B Winder; Georgia J Mason
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Comparison of survival rates in four inbred mouse strains under different housing conditions: effects of environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Kohei Kawakami; Hiroyuki Matsuo; Naoyo Kajitani; Takaya Yamada; Ken-Ichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2021-11-16

6.  The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats.

Authors:  I Joanna Makowska; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Differences in Anticipatory Behaviour between Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Housed in Standard versus Semi-Naturalistic Laboratory Environments.

Authors:  I Joanna Makowska; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.