Literature DB >> 8576772

Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference?

S D Pearson1, L Goldman, E J Orav, E Guadagnoli, T B Garcia, P A Johnson, T H Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physicians' risk attitudes correlate with their triage decisions for emergency department patients with acute chest pain.
DESIGN: Cohort.
SETTING: The emergency department of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the emergency department with a chief complaint of acute chest pain. PHYSICIANS: All physicians who were primarily responsible for the emergency department triage of at least one patient with acute chest pain from July 1990 to July 1991.
METHODS: The physicians' risk attitudes were assessed by two methods: 1) a new, six-question risk-taking scale adapted from the Jackson Personality Index (JPI), and 2) the Stress from Uncertainty Scale (SUS).
RESULTS: The physicians who had high risk-taking scores ("risk seekers") admitted only 31% of the patients they evaluated, compared with admission rates of 44% for the medium scores and 53% for the physicians who had low risk-taking scores ("risk avoiders"), p < 0.001. After adjustment for clinical factors, the patients triaged by the risk-seeking physicians had half the odds of admission [odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.27 to 0.97], and the patients triaged by the risk-avoiding physicians had nearly twice the odds of admission (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.03) of the patients triaged by the medium-risk scoring physicians. The SUS did not correlate significantly with admission rates. Of the 92 patients released home by the risk-seeking physicians, 91 (99%) were known to be alive four to six weeks afterwards and one was lost to follow-up; among the 66 patients released by the risk-avoiding physicians, 64 (97%) were known to be alive at four to six weeks, one was lost to follow-up, and one died of ischemic heart disease during a subsequent hospitalization (p = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The physicians' risk attitudes as measured by a brief risk-taking scale correlated significantly with their rates of admission for emergency department patients with acute chest pain. These data do not suggest that the risk-seeking physicians achieved lower admission rates by releasing more patients who needed to be in the hospital, but an adequate evaluation of the appropriateness of triage decisions of risk-seeking and risk-avoiding physicians will require further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8576772     DOI: 10.1007/bf02640365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  20 in total

1.  Physicians' risk attitudes, laboratory usage, and referral decisions: the case of an academic family practice center.

Authors:  D R Holtgrave; F Lawler; S J Spann
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Risk preference and laboratory use.

Authors:  S D Nightingale
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1987 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  L Goldman; E F Cook; D A Brand; T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey in black patients and white patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  P A Johnson; L Goldman; E J Orav; T Garcia; S D Pearson; T H Lee
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing.

Authors:  G Geller; E S Tambor; G A Chase; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Variations in physician practice: the role of uncertainty.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Ruling out acute myocardial infarction. A prospective multicenter validation of a 12-hour strategy for patients at low risk.

Authors:  T H Lee; G Juarez; E F Cook; M C Weisberg; G W Rouan; D A Brand; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The impact of membership in a health maintenance organization on hospital admission rates for acute chest pain.

Authors:  S D Pearson; T H Lee; E Lindsey; T Hawkins; E F Cook; L Goldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The effects of physicians' training and personality on test ordering for ambulatory patients.

Authors:  A M Epstein; C B Begg; B J McNeil
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  53 in total

1.  Radiologist uncertainty and the interpretation of screening.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore; Linn A Abraham; Martha S Gerrity; R Edward Hendrick; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Steven P Poplack; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Assessing Correlations of Physicians' Practice Intensity and Certainty During Residency Training.

Authors:  C Jessica Dine; Lisa M Bellini; Gretchen Diemer; Allison Ferris; Ashish Rana; Gina Simoncini; William Surkis; Charles Rothschild; David A Asch; Judy A Shea; Andrew J Epstein
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

3.  Health values of patients coinfected with HIV/hepatitis C: are two viruses worse than one?

Authors:  Joseph M Mrus; Kenneth E Sherman; Anthony C Leonard; Susan N Sherman; Karen L Mandell; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  How primary care physicians' attitudes toward risk and uncertainty affect their use of electronic information resources.

Authors:  K Ann McKibbon; Douglas B Fridsma; Rebecca S Crowley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-04

5.  A conceptual model of emergency physician decision making for head computed tomography in mild head injury.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Hemal K Kanzaria; David L Schriger
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Emergency Department Observation Units: Has the Time Come?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Resilience among Employed Physicians and Mid-Level Practitioners in Upstate New York.

Authors:  Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Melinda A Hasbrouck; Nicole Krupa; Paul Jenkins; John J May
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures.

Authors:  Sophie Massin; Antoine Nebout; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-31

9.  Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Nathan F Dieckmann; Christina Holt; Caitlin Gutheil; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Variation in use of echocardiography among veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration vs Medicare.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Fenton H McCarthy; Sheeva Rajaei; Andrew J Epstein; Paul A Heidenreich; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.