Literature DB >> 3613916

Risk preference and laboratory use.

S D Nightingale.   

Abstract

One hundred thirty-seven physicians were asked to choose between a certain loss of five years of life expectancy and a 50/50 gamble of losing either ten years or zero years of life expectancy. These choices were presented as hypothetical options for a patient with cancer. The 46 who chose the certain loss ordered 23% fewer laboratory tests/patient visit in our General Medicine Clinic over an eight-week period than those who chose the gamble (p less than 0.05). This risk preference was further stratified by sequentially offering five, four, three, two, and one years of certain loss against the same 50/50 gamble of ten or zero years of loss; greater preference for the gamble correlated with greater laboratory use (p less than 0.002). To exclude physician knowledge or case mix as a cause of this result, this risk preference was correlated with total score, and with the cost of tests ordered in patient management problems, of 49 physician on the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination. Cost of tests ordered was 23% less for the 17 who chose the certain loss (p less than 0.001); total score did not vary with risk preferences. There was no association between risk preference in the face of gain and laboratory use, and none between an individual's risk preferences in the face of gain and in the face of loss. The cognitive processes that determine risk preference in the face of loss, whatever they may be, appear to have a substantial influence on physician test-ordering behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3613916     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  9 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic decision making of physicians.

Authors:  P Denig; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-02-21

Review 2.  Qualitative research in medicine and health care: questions and controversy.

Authors:  R M Poses; A M Isen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors influencing delayed hospital presentation in patients with appendicitis: the APPE survey.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Variations in Physician Attitudes Regarding ADHD and Their Association With Prescribing Practices.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Laurel K Leslie; Angie Mae Rodday; Susan K Parsons; Tully S Saunders; John B Wong
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.256

5.  Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference?

Authors:  S D Pearson; L Goldman; E J Orav; E Guadagnoli; T B Garcia; P A Johnson; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Sympathy, empathy, and physician resource utilization.

Authors:  S D Nightingale; P R Yarnold; M S Greenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Variability of physicians' thresholds for neuroimaging in children with recurrent headache.

Authors:  Carrie Daymont; Patrick J McDonald; Kristy Wittmeier; Martin H Reed; Michael Moffatt
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Margaret A Grounds; Susan L Joslyn; Jared E LeClerc; Anne P Ehlers; Nidhi Agrawal; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Abraham D Flaxman; David R Flum
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Association of GPs' risk attitudes, level of empathy, and burnout status with PSA testing in primary care.

Authors:  Anette F Pedersen; Anders H Carlsen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.386

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.