Literature DB >> 8575177

Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1993.

C W Flowers1, K Y Chanq, S D McLeod, J A Irvine, P J McDonnell, N Rao, R E Smith.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify new trends in the changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathologic diagnoses of 1,104 corneal buttons that had been submitted to the Estelle Doheny Eye Pathology Laboratory, Los Angeles, during the 5-year period 1989-1993. The leading indications, in order of decreasing frequency, were pseudophakic corneal edema (24.8%), regrafts (21.3%), scarring with or without chronic inflammation (11.1%), keratoconus (7.1%), aphakic corneal edema (6.4%), and ulcerative conditions (5.8%). The incidence of pseudophakic corneal edema remained stable over the study period and was actually surpassed by regraft in the last year of the study. Although pseudophakic corneal edema remains the predominant indication for penetrating keratoplasty, our findings suggest that its occurrence rate has begun to level off.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8575177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period.

Authors:  N Al-Yousuf; I Mavrikakis; E Mavrikakis; S M Daya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States 1980-2005.

Authors:  Faris R Ghosheh; Federico A Cremona; Christopher J Rapuano; Elisabeth J Cohen; Brandon D Ayres; Kristin M Hammersmith; Irving M Raber; Peter R Laibson
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome.

Authors:  H Al-Mezaine; M D Wagoner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register.

Authors:  M Claesson; W J Armitage; P Fagerholm; U Stenevi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Allen O Eghrari; John D Gottsch
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04

6.  Indications for corneal transplantation at a tertiary referral center in tehran.

Authors:  Mohammad Zare; Mohammad-Ali Javadi; Bahram Einollahi; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Siamak Zarei Ghanavati; Mohammad-Reza Jamshidi Farsani; Parviz Mohammadi; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2010-04

7.  Indications and outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in India.

Authors:  M Vanathi; Namrata Sharma; Rajesh Sinha; Radhika Tandon; Jeewan S Titiyal; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Repeat Keratoplasty for Failed Therapeutic Keratoplasty for Microbial Keratitis: An Analysis of Characteristics and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Jifeng Wan; Jing Lin; Yin Hu; Menghuan Wei; Yingshi Zou; Zhaohui Yuan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Changing indications and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation between 2004 and 2009 at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Mohammad Zare; Mohammad A Javadi; Bahram Einollahi; Farid Karimian; Ali R B Rafie; Sepehr Feizi; Ahmad Azimzadeh
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.