Literature DB >> 11815343

Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register.

M Claesson1, W J Armitage, P Fagerholm, U Stenevi.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess visual outcome and the incidence of complications at 2 years postoperatively in corneal grafts reported to the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register.
METHODS: Preoperative and 2 year follow up data were submitted to the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register by surgeons in eight corneal transplant clinics in Sweden. Preoperative data on 1957 grafts and 520 grafts with 2 year follow up were included in the analysis. Data were analysed by multiple linear and logistic regression methods, as appropriate.
RESULTS: The major diagnostic categories were keratoconus (29%), bullous keratopathy (21%), and "other diagnosis" (32%). Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and stromal dystrophies accounted for 15% and 3% of grafts, respectively. At 2 years the overall incidence of complications, other than rejection and regrafting, was 26%, with an increasing frequency from keratoconus < Fuchs' dystrophy < bullous keratopathy < "other diagnosis." Rejection was observed in 15% of grafts and was more likely in the bullous keratopathy (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 9.0, p=0.04) and "other diagnosis" (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.9, p=0.03) groups. Regrafting, which occurred in 10% of cases, was not influenced by diagnosis, but it was related to the incidence of rejection (OR 14.8, 95% CI 6.1 to 35.9, p<0.001) and other complications (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9 to 10.4, p=0.001), and to the presence of other sight threatening pathology in the eye (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 9.9, p=0.01). Visual acuity was improved in a high proportion of the patients, especially those with keratoconus and Fuchs' dystrophy where, respectively, 86% and 54% of grafts achieved a visual acuity of > or =0.5 at 2 years, compared with only 31% with bullous keratopathy and 35% in the "other diagnosis" group. 60% of grafts for keratoconus and Fuchs' dystrophy achieved a visual acuity equal to or better than the other eye. Postoperative astigmatism was higher in the bullous keratopathy (p=0.01) group. Patients with high astigmatism benefited from refractive surgery, showing a reduction from 7.9 (95%CI 6.9, 8.7) to 3.2 (95% CI 2.6, 3.9) dioptres (p<0.001). A centre effect was evident in visual outcome.
CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of complications was related to diagnosis. Complications other than rejection and regrafting were most likely in the "other diagnosis" group, and further analysis of this group is therefore planned. The best improvement in visual acuity and the lowest astigmatism were achieved in the keratoconus and Fuchs' dystrophy groups; but the influence of diagnosis on astigmatism was small and, overall, the statistical model accounted for only 8% of the variability in astigmatism. Refractive surgery was, however, effective in reducing astigmatism. It is hoped that a better understanding of the factors that determine the visual outcome of grafts will emerge from future analyses of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register, helping to refine the criteria for patient selection and to guide clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11815343      PMCID: PMC1771003          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  20 in total

1.  Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  A Brahma; F Ennis; R Harper; A Ridgway; A Tullo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States.

Authors:  K R Dobbins; F W Price; W E Whitson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Vancouver, 1978-87.

Authors:  K F Damji; J Rootman; V A White; P J Dubord; J S Richards
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Corneal re-graft: indications and outcome.

Authors:  C J MacEwen; Z U Khan; E Anderson; C G MacEwen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1988-10

5.  Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  G N Kervick; W F Shepherd
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1990-03

6.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty: 1980-1988.

Authors:  T D Lindquist; J S McGlothan; W M Rotkis; J W Chandler
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Penetrating keratoplasty 1981-1988: clinical indications and pathologic findings.

Authors:  N Mamalis; M T Craig; V L Coulter; M K Lundergan; R J Olson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1989-1995.

Authors:  N Lois; V O Kowal; E J Cohen; C J Rapuano; J A Gault; I M Raber; P R Laibson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1995.

Authors:  N P Patel; T Kim; C J Rapuano; E J Cohen; P R Laibson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  C J Rapuano; E J Cohen; S E Brady; J J Arentsen; P R Laibson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Stemming vision loss with stem cells.

Authors:  Valentina Marchetti; Tim U Krohne; David F Friedlander; Martin Friedlander
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data.

Authors:  P Beckingsale; I Mavrikakis; N Al-Yousuf; E Mavrikakis; S M Daya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Corneal injury: Clinical and molecular aspects.

Authors:  Brayden Barrientez; Sarah E Nicholas; Amy Whelchel; Rabab Sharif; Jesper Hjortdal; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Mark A Terry
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Contact lenses and special back surface design after penetrating keratoplasty to improve contact lens fit and visual outcome.

Authors:  C Gruenauer-Kloevekorn; U Kloevekorn-Fischer; G I W Duncker
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Ashbala Khattak; Fouad R Nakhli; Khaled M Al-Arfaj; Abdullah A Cheema
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Lymphocyte infiltration and activation in iris-ciliary body and anterior chamber of mice in corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Fu-Hua Wang; Min Chen; Ting Liu; Xin-Jie Zang; Hua-Qing Gong; Wei-Yun Shi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity.

Authors:  Philip Maier; Thomas Reinhard; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Corneal grafts at St John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem, January 2001-November 2002.

Authors:  M Claesson; W J Armitage
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Distinct cytokine pattern in aqueous humor during immune reactions following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Philip Maier; Ulrike Heizmann; Daniel Böhringer; Yvonne Kern; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.