Literature DB >> 8573992

Diclofenac/misoprostol. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in painful inflammatory conditions.

R Davis1, Y E Yarker, K L Goa.   

Abstract

Diclofenac is a well established nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used in the treatment of a variety of painful inflammatory conditions. Although generally well tolerated, diclofenac, like other NSAIDs, is associated with gastrointestinal adverse effects which infrequently can be serious and/or life-threatening. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, reduces the incidence of NSAID related ulcers, both gastric and duodenal. The lack of conclusive pharmacoeconomic data for misoprostol and the widespread use of NSAIDs makes routine administration of misoprostol difficult to justify for all NSAID users. However, it appears to be an economically warranted approach in the elderly, who are at particularly high risk for NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications. The fixed combination of diclofenac 50mg and misoprostol 200 micrograms administered 2 to 3 times daily for 4 to 12 weeks has shown equivalent therapeutic efficacy to diclofenac (alone or combined with placebo), piroxicam and naproxen, and was slightly more effective than ibuprofen in clinical studies in patients with a variety of painful inflammatory conditions. No significant differences in therapeutic efficacy were noted between elderly (aged > or = 65 years) and younger patients in these studies. Gastrointestinal adverse events are common with diclofenac and misoprostol, administered alone or in combination. Diarrhoea (presumably attributable to the misoprostol component) appears to be more frequent in diclofenac/misoprostol recipients than in those receiving diclofenac alone or combined with placebo. However, diclofenac/misoprostol recipients had significantly fewer gastroduodenal ulcers at the end of treatment relative to patients receiving comparators in clinical trials. In addition, the types and incidences of adverse events are similar in elderly and younger patients. Routine ulcer prophylaxis with misoprostol in all NSAID users is not warranted from a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint. In common with other fixed combination products, dosage flexibility is somewhat compromised with diclofenac/misoprostol. However, once drug dosages are determined in the individual patient, the fixed combination of diclofenac and misoprostol offers the potential for increased patient convenience and possibly patient compliance, and lower drug acquisition costs than those of the individual drugs used together. Thus, it should be considered a useful treatment option in appropriately selected patients with a high risk for serious NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications who require NSAID therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573992     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199507050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  66 in total

1.  Efficacy of Arthrotec in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J R Hannequin
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1992

2.  A double-blind comparison of the gastroduodenal safety and efficacy of diclofenac and a fixed dose combination of diclofenac and misoprostol in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W Verdickt; C Moran; H Hantzschel; A M Fraga; H Stead; G S Geis
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Comparison of an antiinflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  J D Bradley; K D Brandt; B P Katz; L A Kalasinski; S I Ryan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes.

Authors:  J S Lawrence; J M Bremner; F Bier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Rising frequency of ulcer perforation in elderly people in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Walt; B Katschinski; R Logan; J Ashley; M Langman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Diclofenac/misoprostol vs diclofenac/placebo in treating acute episodes of tendinitis/bursitis of the shoulder.

Authors:  C Zuinen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Efficacy of diclofenac/misoprostol vs diclofenac in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  F McKenna
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Is misoprostol cost-effective in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy in patients with chronic arthritis? A review of conflicting economic evaluations.

Authors:  G Stucki; M Johannesson; M H Liang
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-09-26

9.  Double-blind comparison of efficacy and gastroduodenal safety of diclofenac/misoprostol, piroxicam, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J A Melo Gomes; S H Roth; J Zeeh; G A Bruyn; E M Woods; G S Geis
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  Osteoarthritis in older patients. Optimum treatment.

Authors:  E Bagge; P Brooks
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.923

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Drug-induced diarrhoea.

Authors:  O Chassany; A Michaux; J F Bergmann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Diclofenac/misoprostol. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; H M Lamb
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroprotection with proton pump inhibitors: a focus on ketoprofen/omeprazole.

Authors:  Antonio Gigante; Ignacio Tagarro
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Diclofenac-induced gastric mucosal fluorescence in rats.

Authors:  H Matsui; Y Murata; F Kobayashi; R Shiba; K Momo; Y Kondo; A Nakahara; H Muto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Diclofenac/hyaluronic acid.

Authors:  D C Peters; R H Foster
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.