Literature DB >> 1570496

A double-blind comparison of the gastroduodenal safety and efficacy of diclofenac and a fixed dose combination of diclofenac and misoprostol in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

W Verdickt1, C Moran, H Hantzschel, A M Fraga, H Stead, G S Geis.   

Abstract

This double-blind, parallel group study was conducted to evaluate the gastroduodenal safety and antiarthritic efficacy of a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium 50 mg and misoprostol 200 mcg, compared with a combination of diclofenac 50 mg and placebo. Three hundred and thirty-nine patients with rheumatoid arthritis and no significant gastric or duodenal mucosal damage were enrolled and received study medication (diclofenac/misoprostol, 164; diclofenac/placebo, 175) BID or TID for 12 weeks. Posttreatment gastroduodenal endoscopic examinations revealed ulcers in 11% of the diclofenac/placebo group, compared with only 4% of the diclofenac/misoprostol group (p = 0.034). Four-weekly assessments of arthritic condition revealed no clinically or statistically significant treatment differences. It was concluded that diclofenac/misoprostol caused significantly less gastroduodenal damage than diclofenac, but was as effective as diclofenac alone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1570496     DOI: 10.3109/03009749209095074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  23 in total

Review 1.  Preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Economic considerations, methodological problems and results.

Authors:  G de Pouvourville
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Efficacy and upper GI safety of diclofenac/misoprostol, piroxicam and naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G S Geis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The cost effectiveness of diclofenac plus misoprostol compared with diclofenac monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M J Al; B C Michel; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  [Risk of ulcer and its prophylaxis in therapy with non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs].

Authors:  L Köhler; W Mau; H Zeidler
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-12-15

Review 5.  Diclofenac/misoprostol. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; H M Lamb
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Diclofenac/misoprostol vs diclofenac/placebo in treating acute episodes of tendinitis/bursitis of the shoulder.

Authors:  C Zuinen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Review of the safety of diclofenac/misoprostol.

Authors:  P Gagnier
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Diclofenac/misoprostol. A review of the major clinical trials evaluating its clinical efficacy and upper gastrointestinal tolerability in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  W W Downie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Efficacy of diclofenac/misoprostol vs diclofenac in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  F McKenna
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Use of misoprostol in the elderly: is the expense justified?

Authors:  G Stucki; M Johannesson; M H Liang
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.