Literature DB >> 8571003

Use of knee braces in sport. Current recommendations.

J P Albright, A Saterbak, J Stokes.   

Abstract

This article provides a review of the progress that has been made on the biomechanical, functional performance and epidemiological investigations into the effectiveness of prophylactic knee braces (PKBs) since the position statement against their use was issued in 1987 by the American Academy of Orthopaedics and a review of this subject was last published in Sports Medicine in 1989 by Montgomery and Korziris. The evolution of the salient design features of three surrogate knee models are reviewed along with the results of PKB effectiveness and safety factor testing. While still too limited in scope to be totally realistic, major advances have been made in the sophistication of the present biomechanics laboratory testing conditions. The on-the-field functional performance effects of wearing a knee brace are not always manifest in all individuals. The efficacy of PKBs remains in question but recent studies have taught us enough to put their use into perspective. While they may play some role, PKBs probably represent the least important factor in influencing the likelihood that a medial collateral ligament (MCL) sprain will occur. On the other hand, there is no evidence that such braces put added valgus pressure on some knees, or that wearing a brace is associated with an increased frequency or severity of knee or ankle injury. All else being equal, from the biomechanical studies, we know that whilst some braces are better than others, currently available PKBs can provide 20 to 30% greater resistance to a lateral blow, with the possibility that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is given even greater protection than the MCL. This appears to be true when the lateral blow is of sufficient magnitude to cause significant medial joint line opening, but is not as great at the very lowest levels of impact. Regardless of the material they are made of, the most effective PKBs are those sufficiently stiff to prevent an external blow at the joint line from causing brace hinge contact with the knee tissues. Based on the superior results of the custom-fit functional braces, the most important future design feature appears to be the sizing and fitting of the thigh and tibial cuffs. On the negative side, the presence of a brace may slow an athlete's straight-ahead sprint speed and cause early fatigue to its wearer. This effect appears to vary from one brace to another according to its weight, design features, and pressure from the leg and thigh straps. However, it appears that knee braces do have the potential to restrict performance of the athlete for high-speed running but the effect is related to several factors. The weight of the brace resultant friction of the hinges, completeness of fit, and tightness of straps appear to be important. The most measurable effects include: increased muscular relaxation pressures; increased energy expenditure; and a related increase in blood lactate levels, maximal torque output, oxygen consumption and heart rate. On the other hand, experienced brace wearers and larger, stronger individuals displayed fewer, or no effects of donning a brace. Improvements in the protectiveness of the PKB are likely to accompany improvements in the ability to contour the braces to fit each individual's leg in the equipment room without the added expense of the cast-moulding process. Further improvement may be realised by friction-free polycentric joints, as well as an attachment system that minimises thigh and calf soft tissue compression perhaps by incorporating the braces into the trousers of the uniform to provide suspension from the waist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8571003     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199520050-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  43 in total

1.  Functional testing of braces for anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees.

Authors:  H J Marans; R W Jackson; J Piccinin; R L Silver; D K Kennedy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The effects of knee brace wear on perceptual and metabolic variables during horizontal treadmill running.

Authors:  C L Highgenboten; A Jackson; N Meske; J Smith
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint.

Authors:  H H Hsieh; P S Walker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A dynamic analysis of a functional brace for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Authors:  F F Cook; J E Tibone; F C Redfern
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  The knee brace controversy.

Authors:  D L Montgomery; P L Koziris
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance.

Authors:  G A Sforzo; N M Chen; C A Gold; P A Frye
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  The effect of wearing the complete Lenox Hill Derotation Brace on energy expenditure during horizontal treadmill running at 161 meters per minute.

Authors:  A E Zetterlund; R C Serfass; R E Hunter
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The prime static stabilizer of the medical side of the knee.

Authors:  L A Warren; J L Marshall; F Girgis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Medial collateral ligament knee sprains in college football. Brace wear preferences and injury risk.

Authors:  J P Albright; J W Powell; W Smith; A Martindale; E Crowley; J Monroe; R Miller; J Connolly; B A Hill; D Miller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus.

Authors:  K L Markolf; A Graff-Radford; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Use of discretionary protective equipment in high school athletes: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Jingzhen Yang; J Michael Bowling; Megan A Lewis; Stephen W Marshall; Carol W Runyan; Frederick O Mueller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance: balance, proprioception, coordination, and muscular power.

Authors:  Gul Baltaci; Gulcan Aktas; Elif Camci; Sevim Oksuz; Seda Yildiz; Tugce Kalaycioglu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Physician-directed injury prevention for young skiers and snowboarders.

Authors:  A J Macnab; R E Cadman; J V Greenlaw
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  CORR Insights®: A 40-year Study of the Factors Associated with Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Skiers and Snowboarders.

Authors:  Xavier Ampuero Duralde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  The incidence of motocross injuries: a 12-year investigation.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Benjamin Tuy; Ian Panuncialman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effectiveness of prophylactic knee bracing in american football: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael J Salata; Aimee E Gibbs; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Influence of functional knee bracing on the isokinetic and functional tests of anterior cruciate ligament deficient patients.

Authors:  Niyousha Mortaza; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Ali Ashraf Jamshidi; Javad Razjouyan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.