PURPOSE: Prophylactic knee braces are largely used in the prevention of ligament injuries, but their effectiveness on performance are still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which brace was the most effective on functional performance. METHOD: Twenty-four healthy subjects (14 men and 10 women), between the age of 18 and 22 with no prior history of lower limb injury and brace use, voluntarily participated in this study. Five different prophylactic knee braces were used. The test protocol consisted of dynamic balance, jumping performance, proprioception, coordination, and maximal force. Balance was assessed by the Y balance test; jumping performance was assessed by vertical jump and one-leg hop tests; maximal force, proprioception, and coordination were assessed by using functional squat testing. Proprioceptive test was performed by using the functional squat system machine that the participants were instructed to keep the crosshair on the line, even after the visual aid had disappeared. The subjects without a brace and with the brace by using 5 different braces (DonJoy-USA) were evaluated by five different therapists. RESULTS: Hinged "H" buttress for the support of the knee brace was found to be more effective than the others in terms of balance. Drytex economy hinged knee brace had the best result in terms of proprioception and maximal force. There were no significant differences in vertical jump and one-leg hop tests (n.s.). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the hinged "H" buttress for support of the knee brace and Drytex economy hinged knee brace produced the best results on the performance parameters. The other three braces demonstrated more variable and less optimal results. Prophylactic knee braces can be used for both healthy subjects and athletes to enhance proprioception, coordination, maximal force, and balance, but it is important to choose the best proper brace to the individuals according to their fitness level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (Economic and decision analysis-developing an economic or decision model), Level II.
PURPOSE: Prophylactic knee braces are largely used in the prevention of ligament injuries, but their effectiveness on performance are still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which brace was the most effective on functional performance. METHOD: Twenty-four healthy subjects (14 men and 10 women), between the age of 18 and 22 with no prior history of lower limb injury and brace use, voluntarily participated in this study. Five different prophylactic knee braces were used. The test protocol consisted of dynamic balance, jumping performance, proprioception, coordination, and maximal force. Balance was assessed by the Y balance test; jumping performance was assessed by vertical jump and one-leg hop tests; maximal force, proprioception, and coordination were assessed by using functional squat testing. Proprioceptive test was performed by using the functional squat system machine that the participants were instructed to keep the crosshair on the line, even after the visual aid had disappeared. The subjects without a brace and with the brace by using 5 different braces (DonJoy-USA) were evaluated by five different therapists. RESULTS: Hinged "H" buttress for the support of the knee brace was found to be more effective than the others in terms of balance. Drytex economy hinged knee brace had the best result in terms of proprioception and maximal force. There were no significant differences in vertical jump and one-leg hop tests (n.s.). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the hinged "H" buttress for support of the knee brace and Drytex economy hinged knee brace produced the best results on the performance parameters. The other three braces demonstrated more variable and less optimal results. Prophylactic knee braces can be used for both healthy subjects and athletes to enhance proprioception, coordination, maximal force, and balance, but it is important to choose the best proper brace to the individuals according to their fitness level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (Economic and decision analysis-developing an economic or decision model), Level II.
Authors: J P Albright; J W Powell; W Smith; A Martindale; E Crowley; J Monroe; R Miller; J Connolly; B A Hill; D Miller Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 1994 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Neetu Rishiraj; Jack E Taunton; Robert Lloyd-Smith; Robert Woollard; William Regan; D B Clement Journal: Sports Med Date: 2009 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Max Daniel Kauther; Silvia Rummel; Bjoern Hussmann; Sven Lendemans; Christian Wedemeyer; Marcus Jaeger Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Niyousha Mortaza; Ismail Ebrahimi; Ali Ashraf Jamshidi; Vahid Abdollah; Mohammad Kamali; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas; Noor Azuan Abu Osman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240