Literature DB >> 3752350

The effect of wearing the complete Lenox Hill Derotation Brace on energy expenditure during horizontal treadmill running at 161 meters per minute.

A E Zetterlund, R C Serfass, R E Hunter.   

Abstract

Ten volunteer subjects (means age = 26.6 +/- 4.9 years, means height = 177.9 +/- 5.6 cm, and means weight = 76.9 +/- 11.2 kg) who had been wearing the Lenox Hill Derotation Brace (LHB) for a mean time of 23.9 +/- 28.0 months were familiarized with horizontal treadmill running at 161 m/min with and without the LHB. They were then tested randomly for four runs, two with the LHB and two without the LHB. Metabolic measurements using a device that counted footstrikes on the treadmill were taken during the 3rd and 6th minutes of each run. Regardless of sampling time, wearing the LHB produced significantly higher values for VO2 (4.58%, P less than 0.025) and heart rate (5.10%, P less than 0.004) compared to the no brace condition. Regardless of whether or not the subjects were wearing the LHB, 6 minute values were significantly higher than 3 minute values for VO2 (5.89%, P less than 0.0004), VE (10.8%, P less than 0.004), heart rate (5.35%, P less than 0.0000), and R (2.17%, P less than 0.038). The mean 6 minute values of VO2 with (37.42 +/- 3.55 ml/kg/min) and without (35.54 +/- 2.17 ml/kg/min) the brace fall within the range of expected values of 28.1 to 39.3 ml/kg/min derived from regression equations from the literature which predict VO2 response to horizontal treadmill running. Mean stride lengths while wearing the LHB (97.85 cm) were not significantly different from mean stride lengths without the LHB (98.56 cm). It is concluded that wearing the LHB produces a 4.58% increase in energy expenditure during horizontal treadmill running at 161 m/min which cannot be attributed to changes in stride length or to time of sampling during the run.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3752350     DOI: 10.1177/036354658601400112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  5 in total

Review 1.  The effects of functional knee bracing on muscle function and performance.

Authors:  J Styf
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The knee brace controversy.

Authors:  D L Montgomery; P L Koziris
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Biomechanical effects of functional knee bracing. Practical implications.

Authors:  J C Vailas; M Pink
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Use of knee braces in sport. Current recommendations.

Authors:  J P Albright; A Saterbak; J Stokes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The potential role of prophylactic/functional knee bracing in preventing knee ligament injury.

Authors:  Neetu Rishiraj; Jack E Taunton; Robert Lloyd-Smith; Robert Woollard; William Regan; D B Clement
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.