Literature DB >> 8567448

Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise.

C I Berlin1, L J Hood, A E Hurley, H Wen, D T Kemp.   

Abstract

We studied the efferent suppression of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions with 65 dB SPL of white noise presented to left, right, or sometimes both, ears for 408 ms. Each burst of noise preceded a series of four unipolar 80 microseconds 65 dB peak Sound Pressure clicks, presented to the left ear only. The first click of the four-click group followed the end of the noise by either 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 or 200 ms; each subsequent click was offset by 20 additional ms via an ILO88 system with special programming modifications. Conditions were alternated so that a 'without noise' condition preceded a 'with noise' condition for three repetitions of 600 clicks per trial. Seven subjects with normal hearing participated in the study, and three of the seven participated in a test-retest reliability study. Results showed the greatest suppression followed binaural stimulation ending within one to five ms of the first click in the pulse train. Somewhat less suppression was seen following ipsilateral stimulation. The least amount of suppression was seen following contralateral stimulation, suggesting that previous research using contralateral stimulation may underestimate efferent effects. We saw no effects when the end of the noise was 100 ms or more away from the beginning of the click train.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8567448     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00082-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  20 in total

1.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

2.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

3.  Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Children with autism spectrum disorder have reduced otoacoustic emissions at the 1 kHz mid-frequency region.

Authors:  Loisa Bennetto; Jessica M Keith; Paul D Allen; Anne E Luebke
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  Temporal Effects on Monaural Amplitude-Modulation Sensitivity in Ipsilateral, Contralateral and Bilateral Noise.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Luis E López-Bascuas; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05

6.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Unrelated to the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural Encoding of Amplitude Modulations in the Human Efferent System.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-29

8.  Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory event-related potentials and function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Thierry Morlet; Kyoko Nagao; L Ashleigh Greenwood; R Matthew Cardinale; Rebecca G Gaffney; Tammy Riegner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The medial olivocochlear reflex in children during active listening.

Authors:  Spencer B Smith; Barbara Cone
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.