Literature DB >> 8567432

Comodulation masking release in a songbird.

G M Klump1, U Langemann.   

Abstract

Comodulation masking release (CMR) describes the reduced masking of a pure tone when the masking is a noise that is coherently amplitude modulated (comodulated) over the total range of the spectrum compared to masking by an unmodulated noise of the same bandwidth and overall energy. The masking release results from cues available within a critical band and from cues generated by comparisons across critical bands ('true' CMR). Here we report data on masking release and 'true' CMR in a songbird, the European starling (Strunus vulgaris), that was demonstrated in a psychoacoustic experiment using a GO/NOGO paradigm. Masked thresholds for 2-kHz tones centered in digitally generated continuous masking noise of different bandwidths were determined, and the amount of masking release was calculated as the threshold difference between the unmodulated and the comodulated condition. In the first experiment the modulator was a 50-Hz lowpass noise. A masking release of 11.8 dB was found for the noise masker with the largest bandwidth (1600 Hz). With the masker bandwidth decreasing to 50 Hz, the birds' release from masking was reduced to 1.6 dB. The starling's 'true' CMR was 4 dB or 8 dB, depending on the definition that was applied. In a second experiment the masker bandwidth was constant (1600 Hz) and the cut-off frequency of the modulator was varied. A release from masking of 17.8 dB was found for a modulator cut-off frequency of 12.5 Hz. It decreased to 6.1 dB with an increase in the modulator cut-off frequency to 400 Hz. The duration of the test signal (100-750 ms) had little effect on the release from masking. Given the similarities in the release from masking and in CMR of starlings and humans, the starling may provide an excellent model for studying the mechanisms that underlie the generation of CMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8567432     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00087-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  20 in total

1.  Physiological correlates of comodulation masking release in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  D Pressnitzer; R Meddis; R Delahaye; I M Winter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.

Authors:  B Ronacher; C Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Variability of spike trains and the processing of temporal patterns of acoustic signals-problems, constraints, and solutions.

Authors:  B Ronacher; A Franz; S Wohlgemuth; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 5.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Comodulation masking release in the inferior colliculus by combined signal enhancement and masker reduction.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Betsy Jo Linehan-Skillings; Yuwen Gu; Yuting Sun; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Signal-to-noise ratio for source determination and for a comodulated masker in goldfish, Carassius auratus.

Authors:  Richard R Fay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.