Literature DB >> 21568437

Signal-to-noise ratio for source determination and for a comodulated masker in goldfish, Carassius auratus.

Richard R Fay1.   

Abstract

The masking effects of white and amplitude comodulated noise were studied with respect to simple signal detection and sound source determination in goldfish. A stimulus generalization method was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio required to completely determine the signal's characteristics. It was found that the S∕N required for this determination is about 4 dB greater than that required for signal detection, or was about 4 dB greater than the critical masking ratio. This means that the potential harm to fish of a given masking noise is at least 4 dB greater than previously thought, based on critical masking ratios. However, for amplitude comodulated noise between 10 and 50 Hz modulation rate, the potential harmful effects are up to 5.3 dB less than would be predicted from the critical masking ratio for unmodulated noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568437      PMCID: PMC3108397          DOI: 10.1121/1.3562179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

Review 1.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Niels Bouton; Ilse van Opzeeland; Aukje Coers; Carel ten Cate; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Analytic listening by the goldfish.

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Auditory image perception and analysis: the basis for hearing.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sound source segregation by goldfish: two simultaneous tones.

Authors:  Richard R Fay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rethinking sound detection by fishes.

Authors:  Arthur N Popper; Richard R Fay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Signal-noise ratio and the critical band in fishes.

Authors:  W N Tavolga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal discrimination in the goldfish.

Authors:  R R Fay; B Passow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Psychometric functions for level discrimination and the effects of signal duration in the goldfish (Carassius auratus): psychophysics and neurophysiology.

Authors:  R R Fay; S L Coombs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking of tones by noise for the goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Betsy Jo Linehan-Skillings; Yuwen Gu; Yuting Sun; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Jessica L Ward; Alejandro Vélez; Christophe Micheyl; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.231

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.