Literature DB >> 8562537

Assessment of an inner city visual screening programme for preschool children.

T H Williamson1, R Andrews, G N Dutton, G Murray, N Graham.   

Abstract

AIMS: The efficiency of preschool visual screening programmes to detect amblyopia is questionable. In this study such a programme in an inner city was assessed to determine its effectiveness.
METHODS: The results of screening and hospital treatment of 712 patients who were considered to require referral were entered into a database for analysis. Default rates were assessed and the efficacy of treatment determined.
RESULTS: The only effective screening test for the detection of amblyopia was visual acuity. A large proportion of referred patients had refractive problems only. High default rates, particularly in geographical areas of lower socioeconomic grading, severely handicapped any attempt to reduce the incidence of amblyopia.
CONCLUSION: A fresh approach to the detection and care of amblyopia in the inner city community is required, perhaps by performing screening of children in their first year of attendance at school to reduce default rates. Cycloplegic refraction of children who are found to have reduced visual acuity before their referral to hospital is also recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8562537      PMCID: PMC505342          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.79.12.1068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  20 in total

1.  Preschool vision screening: a service in need of rationalisation.

Authors:  S L Stewart-Brown; M N Haslum; B Howlett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  The application of a comprehensive visual screening programme to children aged 3-5 years. Can a modified procedure be devised for visual screening by ancillary staff?

Authors:  S Dholakia
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Simple retinoscopic screening.

Authors:  J M Olver
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Screening?

Authors:  D Taylor
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1985

5.  Screening for visual defects in preschoolchildren.

Authors:  R M Ingram; W W Holland; C Walker; J M Wilson; P E Arnold; S Dally
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The problem of screening children for visual defects.

Authors:  R M Ingram
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Residual amblyopia in recruits to the British Army.

Authors:  B Hopkisson; J R Clarke; B J Oelman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-10-02

8.  Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus. Programs, methods, guidelines, 1983.

Authors:  M I Ehrlich; R D Reinecke; K Simons
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Mobile orthoptic service for primary screening of visual disorder in young children.

Authors:  A V MacLellan; P Harker
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-04-14

10.  Compliance and results of treatment for amblyopia in children more than 8 years old.

Authors:  M Oliver; R Neumann; Y Chaimovitch; N Gotesman; M Shimshoni
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  19 in total

1.  Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening.

Authors:  J Bamford; A Davis; J Boyle; J Law; S Chapman; S S Brown; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

2.  Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.

Authors:  D K Newman; M M East
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests.

Authors:  A J Simmers; L S Gray; K Spowart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Should we be screening for and treating amblyopia?

Authors:  Gordon N Dutton; Marie Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-29

5.  Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  C Williams; K Northstone; R A Harrad; J M Sparrow; I Harvey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  An inner city preschool visual screening programme: long-term visual results.

Authors:  R J Bowman; T H Williamson; R G Andrews; T C Aitchison; G N Dutton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Visual screening programme for preschool children.

Authors:  K M Spowart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Ophthalmic Abnormalities among Children Treated with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ziya Ayhan; Serpil Mungan Durankaya; Gül Arıkan; Günay Kırkım; Aslı Çakır Çetin; Yüksel Olgun; Üzeyir Günenç; Enis Alpin Güneri
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance.

Authors:  K Simons; M Preslan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.