BACKGROUND/AIMS: Preschool screening for amblyopia has controversially been abandoned in some localities within the United Kingdom, on the basis that there is no clear evidence of benefit to support its continuation. Data collected within a birth cohort study were used to examine visual outcomes at 7(1/2) years in children who did or did not receive preschool vision screening. METHODS: Monocular logMAR visual acuity with and without a pinhole was assessed by orthoptists. Contemporary records were used to identify children who had been offered and/or received preschool screening. RESULTS: Of 6081 children, 24.9% had been offered preschool screening and 16.7% had attended. The prevalence of amblyopia was approximately 45% lower in the children who received preschool screening than in those who did not (1.1% v 2.0%, p = 0.05). The mean acuity in the worse seeing eyes after patching treatment was better for amblyopic children who received preschool screening than for those who did not; 0.14 v 0.20 logMAR (p <0.001). These effects did not persist in an intention to screen analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preschool screening at 37 months was associated with an improved treatment outcome for individuals with amblyopia. However, the improvement was clinically small and disappeared when considering all children offered screening rather than only those who received it. Further research is needed into improving the effectiveness of vision screening for preschool children, while in the interim these data do not conflict with current recommendations for school entry screening by orthoptists.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Preschool screening for amblyopia has controversially been abandoned in some localities within the United Kingdom, on the basis that there is no clear evidence of benefit to support its continuation. Data collected within a birth cohort study were used to examine visual outcomes at 7(1/2) years in children who did or did not receive preschool vision screening. METHODS: Monocular logMAR visual acuity with and without a pinhole was assessed by orthoptists. Contemporary records were used to identify children who had been offered and/or received preschool screening. RESULTS: Of 6081 children, 24.9% had been offered preschool screening and 16.7% had attended. The prevalence of amblyopia was approximately 45% lower in the children who received preschool screening than in those who did not (1.1% v 2.0%, p = 0.05). The mean acuity in the worse seeing eyes after patching treatment was better for amblyopic children who received preschool screening than for those who did not; 0.14 v 0.20 logMAR (p <0.001). These effects did not persist in an intention to screen analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preschool screening at 37 months was associated with an improved treatment outcome for individuals with amblyopia. However, the improvement was clinically small and disappeared when considering all children offered screening rather than only those who received it. Further research is needed into improving the effectiveness of vision screening for preschool children, while in the interim these data do not conflict with current recommendations for school entry screening by orthoptists.
Authors: Jing Fu; Shi Ming Li; Si Yuan Li; Jin Ling Li; He Li; Bi Dan Zhu; Zhou Yang; Lei Li; Ning Li Wang Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: N Herbison; S Cobb; R Gregson; I Ash; R Eastgate; J Purdy; T Hepburn; D MacKeith; A Foss Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: David S Friedman; Michael X Repka; Joanne Katz; Lydia Giordano; Josephine Ibironke; Patricia Hawse; James M Tielsch Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 2.209