Literature DB >> 8560812

Unequal amplitude saccades produced by aniseikonic patterns: effects of viewing distance.

J van der Steen1, P Bruno.   

Abstract

This study describes differences in horizontal and vertical disconjugate saccades under far and close viewing conditions of two dichoptically presented aniseikonic random checkerboard patterns. At far viewing, disconjugacy of horizontal saccades requiring divergence was accomplished intrasaccadically after several minutes; for convergence the intrasaccadic disconjugacy was limited. Size differences partially persisted in open-loop trials. At close viewing intrasaccadic divergent changes in conjugacy were instantaneous, but motor storage during open-loop was absent. It is concluded that disconjugate saccades to targets at far distance lead to an adaptation process, whereas at close viewing distance horizontal disparity is a visual compensation process used directly to scale the relative amplitudes of both eyes, not leading to adaptation. The time-course of disconjugate vertical saccades was much slower, with mostly postsaccadic vergence. Nearby viewing enhanced the disconjugacy of vertical saccades.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8560812     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00138-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Disconjugate vertical memory-guided saccades to disparate targets.

Authors:  S Paris; M P Bucci; Z Kapoula
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Oculomotor consequences of feeble image size inequality at near reading distance.

Authors:  Maria Pia Bucci; Stephanie Paris; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception can influence the vergence responses associated with open-loop gaze shifts in 3D.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Frederick A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Saccadic search performance: the effect of element spacing.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Eelco A B Over; Ignace Th C Hooge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: the Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm.

Authors:  Ralf van der Lans; Michel Wedel; Rik Pieters
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-03

6.  Short-term saccadic adaptation in the macaque monkey: a binocular mechanism.

Authors:  K P Schultz; C Busettini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Binocular eye movement control and motion perception: what is being tracked?

Authors:  Johannes van der Steen; Joyce Dits
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Fixation classification: how to merge and select fixation candidates.

Authors:  Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Marcus Nyström; Richard Andersson; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-01-12

9.  Saccadic selection and crowding in visual search: stronger lateral masking leads to shorter search times.

Authors:  Jelmer P de Vries; Ignace T C Hooge; Marco A Wiering; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Brief report: eye movements during visual search tasks indicate enhanced stimulus discriminability in subjects with PDD.

Authors:  Chantal Kemner; Lizet van Ewijk; Herman van Engeland; Ignace Hooge
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.