Literature DB >> 8559544

An inevitable dilemma: prenatal testing for mutations in the BRCA1 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility gene.

J M Lancaster1, R W Wiseman, A Berchuck.   

Abstract

The BRCA1 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility gene was identified recently. Germline mutations in BRCA1 may be responsible for as many as 5% of breast and ovarian cancers. Inherited alterations confer up to a 94% risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer by age 70. With the discovery of BRCA1, there will be a heavy demand for genetic testing. Because of the large size of the gene and the distribution of reported mutations, scientists face considerable technical problems in developing widely available screening tests; clinicians will face even greater ethical problems in applying them. In the context of research programs, women with BRCA1 mutations are already being identified, and their physicians are confronted with a number of complex medical, ethical, legal, and social issues. Obstetricians will be faced with counseling parents regarding prenatal testing for specific BRCA1 mutations. Although it is difficult to formulate straightforward guidelines regarding prenatal BRCA1 testing, clinicians and health care providers must be familiar with the nuances of the debate so that these issues can be discussed wisely with patients. As with many ethically challenging problems in medicine, individual clinicians and their patients will have to work together to determine the course of action with which they are most comfortable. Although elective termination of a pregnancy with a germline mutation in BRCA1 is an option, experience with other adult-onset diseases suggests that only a minority of parents will choose this option.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8559544     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00405-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?

Authors:  Timothy Krahn
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ormondroyd; Louise Donnelly; Clare Moynihan; Cornelie Savona; Elizabeth Bancroft; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Stuart Lavery; Maggie Watson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Attitudes toward childbearing and prenatal testing in individuals undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Akriti Dewanwala; Anu Chittenden; Margery Rosenblatt; Rowena Mercado; Judy E Garber; Sapna Syngal; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Kelly Gilmore; Emily Hardisty; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Cancer risk reduction and reproductive concerns in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Allison W Kurian; Kristin Cobb; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Lindsey M King; Cheryl A Miree; Sue Friedman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.