Literature DB >> 16752933

Dose adaptation of antineoplastic drugs in patients with liver disease.

Lydia Tchambaz1, Chantal Schlatter, Max Jakob, Anita Krähenbühl, Peter Wolf, Stephan Krähenbühl.   

Abstract

Dose adaptation for liver disease is important in patients treated with antineoplastic drugs because of the high prevalence of impaired liver function in this population and the dose-dependent, frequently serious adverse effects of these drugs. We classified the antineoplastic drugs marketed in Switzerland at the end of 2004 according to their bioavailability and/or hepatic extraction to predict their kinetic behaviour in patients with decreased liver function. This prediction was compared with kinetic studies carried out with these drugs in patients with liver disease. The studies were identified by a structured, computer-based literature search. Of the 69 drugs identified, 52 had a predominant extrarenal (in most cases hepatic) metabolism and/or excretion. For 49 drugs, hepatic extraction could be calculated and/or bioavailability data were available, allowing classification according to hepatic extraction. For 18 drugs, kinetic studies have been reported in patients with impaired liver function, with the findings generally resulting in quantitative recommendations for adaptation of the dosage. In particular, recommendations are precise for 16 drugs excreted by the bile (e.g. doxorubicin and derivatives and vinca alkaloids). Validation studies comparing such recommendations with kinetics and/or dynamics of antineoplastic drugs in patients with decreased liver function have not been published. We conclude that there are currently not enough data for safe use of cyctostatics in patients with liver disease. Pharmaceutical companies should be urged to provide kinetic data (especially hepatic extraction data) for the classification of such drugs and to conduct kinetic studies for drugs with primarily hepatic metabolism in patients with impaired liver function to allow quantitative advice to be given for dose adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752933     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200629060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  138 in total

1.  Fulminant hepatic failure in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  L T Soh; P T Ang; I Sng; E J Chua; Y W Ong
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Biliary excretion and pharmacokinetics of 4'epidoxorubicin (epirubicin) in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  C M Camaggi; E Strocchi; R Comparsi; F Testoni; B Angelelli; F Pannuti
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Pharmacokinetics of estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) in prostatic cancer patients.

Authors:  P O Gunnarsson; S B Andersson; S A Johansson; T Nilsson; G Plym-Forshell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Methotrexate hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  S G West
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Cellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of weekly 20-mg 4'-epi-adriamycin bolus injection in patients with advanced breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P A Speth; P C Linssen; L V Beex; J B Boezeman; C Haanen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  The pharmacokinetics of vincristine in man: reduced drug clearance associated with raised serum alkaline phosphatase and dose-limited elimination.

Authors:  H W Van den Berg; Z R Desai; R Wilson; G Kennedy; J M Bridges; R G Shanks
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Predicting etoposide toxicity: relationship to organ function and protein binding.

Authors:  S P Joel; R Shah; P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mitoxantrone use in breast cancer patients with elevated bilirubin.

Authors:  R T Chlebowski; L Bulcavage; I C Henderson; T Woodcock; R Rivest; R Elashoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky; L A Cazenave; R C Donehower
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Anthracycline doses in patients with liver dysfunction: do UK oncologists follow current recommendations?

Authors:  N A Dobbs; C J Twelves
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes in lymphoma patients with obstructive jaundice: a cancer center experience.

Authors:  William A Ross; Chukwuma I Egwim; Michael J Wallace; Michael Wang; David C Madoff; Jeffrey H Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Dose adjustment in patients with liver cirrhosis: impact on adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations.

Authors:  Carmen C Franz; Carole Hildbrand; Christa Born; Sabin Egger; Alexandra E Rätz Bravo; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Roger K Verbeeck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic changes of psychotropic drugs in patients with liver disease: implications for dose adaptation.

Authors:  Chantal Schlatter; Sabin S Egger; Lydia Tchambaz; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Bile Acid Dysregulation Is Intrinsically Related to Cachexia in Tumor-Bearing Mice.

Authors:  Morgane M Thibaut; Justine Gillard; Adeline Dolly; Martin Roumain; Isabelle A Leclercq; Nathalie M Delzenne; Giulio G Muccioli; Laure B Bindels
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.